Navigation
Open Access
Review

Exosomes mediate embryo and maternal interactions at implantation and during pregnancy

Lindsey A. Burnett1,Romana A. Nowak2,*
1
Medical Scholars Program, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801
2
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, 61801
DOI: 10.2741/S448 Volume 8 Issue 1, pp.79-96
Published: 01 January 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exosomes: their role in the reproductive tracts)
*Corresponding Author(s):  
Romana A. Nowak
E-mail:  
ranowak@illinois.edu
Abstract

Shedding of exosomes and microvesicles is now a well-recognized, important method of cell-cell communication in a number of different cell types. However, their importance in the female reproductive tract and in mediating embryo-maternal interactions during pregnancy has only recently been recognized. Here we review the current literature as to release of extracellular vesicles by uterine cells, the embryo, and placental trophoblast cells; how release is regulated; and the different types of signaling molecules and genetic information contained within such vesicles. We also discuss the role of these exosomes and microvesicles in regulating critical processes during implantation and pregnancy such as angiogenesis, matrix remodeling, alterations in immune function and pathological effects in gestational diseases. A better understanding of the role of exosomes and microvesicles in reproduction may lead to the development of new therapeutic approaches for treatment of infertility and pregnancy complications.

Key words

Microvesicles, Exosomes, Uterus, Placenta, Review, Extracellular Vesicles, Review

2. Introduction

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been well-studied in many systems and play critical roles in angiogenesis, immunomodulation, cell survival, and inflammation; however, their role in implantation, placental physiology, and pregnancy are only beginning to be understood and appreciated. EVs have been shown to regulate many processes including angiogenesis, adhesion, proliferation, cell survival, inflammation, and immune response. Although less is known about the role of EVs in reproductive physiology and pathophysiology many of the processes known to involve EVs are critical to implantation, placental development, and placental function. The role of these vesicles in reproductive tissues is only beginning to be elucidated. Here we review current knowledge of EV formation, content, and function with an emphasis on the emerging role of EVs in reproductive physiology.

2.1. Extracellular vesicles mediate intercellular communication

EVs, although initially thought to be artifacts, have been shown to be a critical method of intercellular communication necessary for cell survival and maintenance in almost every multicellular system identified. EVs are shed from many cell types and are present in all human body fluids that have been examined to date including blood, urine, saliva, milk, uterine fluid, cerebrospinal fluid and synovial fluid (1-3). The quantity, type, composition, and functional properties of EVs are associated with the cell type of origin, physiologic or pathophysiologic state. EVs have been shown to play critical roles in a number of physiologic as well as pathophysiologic processes including coagulation, angiogenesis, tumor progression, cell survival, immunoregulation, and inflammation.

EVs provide a unique form of intercellular communication. These vesicles are an efficient mechanism of transport for soluble and membrane-bound proteins (4-6), second messengers, genetic information including mRNAs and miRNAs (4,5,7-11), and lipids with the potential for specific targeting via cell surface receptor interactions (12). These vesicles may also serve to eliminate harmful intracellular or membrane-bound components in a way that reduces exposure to other cells (13, 14). Four different types of EVs have been reported that have differing methods of generation and release: exosomes, microvesicles, membrane particles and apoptotic vesicles (1,2,4,8,15-22). It is currently unclear whether each represents an independent type of vesicle and in many cases more than one type of vesicle is present in a fluid population suggesting some overlap in vesicle type and/or release. Three vesicle types have been identified unambiguously: microvesicles, exosomes, and apoptotic bodies.

3. Types of extracellular vesicles

3.1. Exosomes

Exosomes are the best characterized of EVs. They are cup-shaped phospholipid bilayer vesicles that range in size from 40-100 nM and are formed in the late endosomal compartment by inward budding of the membrane of late multivesicular bodies (MVBs) (1,23,24) (Figure 1). Formation of intraluminal vesicles in multivesicular bodies has been shown to involve the endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT); however, additional studies indicate that these vesicles may be formed independently of this complex (25). ESCRT has been shown to be involved in inward budding of intraluminal vesicles of MVBs and cleavage of the necks of these vesicles. Once the vesicles are present in MVBs they can be secreted as exosomes by fusion of MVBs with the plasma membrane or alternatively degraded via lysosomal fusion (26,27). Secretion of exosomes from the endosomal compartment of MVBs by fusion with the plasma membrane has been shown to be dependent on intracellular calcium (28). Release may be constitutive as seen in epithelial and dendritic cells or tightly regulated as seen in mast and T cells (29-32). The exosomal membrane is detergent resistant and high in cholesterol, sphingolipids and tetraspanins. Inhibition of sphingomyelinase decreases exosome release suggesting stabilization of lipid rafts by ceramide may be required for exosome release. Exosomes appear to be enriched in specific lipids and proteins; studies have shown protein-specific elimination of the transferrin receptor in exosomes, however, the mechanism of this enrichment remains unclear (25, 33-36). Exosomes contain proteins, mRNAs, and miRNAs based on the tissue of origin. Many cytoplasmic proteins are found in exosomes including cytostructural proteins such as tubulin, actin, annexins and actin-binding proteins as well as signaling proteins such as signal transduction kinases, cytokines, and heterotrimeric G-proteins. Adhesion molecules such as β integrins and ICAM-1 are found on the exosomal surface as are the tetraspanins CD9, CD63, CD81, and CD82 which have become exosomal markers (16,21,22,37-40).

Figure 1. Generation of exosomes oocurs via formation of multivesicular bodies within the cytoplasm of the cell that then undergo exocytosis (Adapted from 8).

3.2. Microvesicles

In contrast to exosomes, microvesicles or shedding vesicles are thought to be formed by outward budding of the plasma membrane (Figure 2). They are heterogeneous in size and can be as large as 1000 nM. Similarly to exosomes they exhibit enrichment in specific proteins and lipids (8,41). Lipid rafts rich in cholesterol may be significant for establishing microdomains for shedding as depletion of cholesterol from the plasma membrane decreases microvesicle shedding (42). Microvesicle release has been shown to be initiated by rises in intracellular calcium which leads to subsequent activation of scramblase and calpain resulting in microvesicle formation (1, 8, 24, 43-45). Release of microvesicles is thought to be tightly regulated in contrast to exosomal release which can also be constitutive. Cytoplasmic proteins in microvesicles include annexins, caspases, FGF, and IL-1β. Typical membrane-bound proteins include integrins and matrix metalloproteinases.

Figure 2. Generation of microvesicles occurs through reverse budding which is the result of alterations in the cytoskeletal structure underlying the plasma membrane of the cell. (Adapted from 8).

3.3. Apoptotic bodies

Apoptotic bodies are formed during apoptosis. Cells shrink in size and fragment during apoptosis, forming apoptotic bodies. These vesicles are heterogenous in size ranging from 50-5000 nm Intracelullar calcium is increased during apoptosis serving as an initiating event for apoptotic body formation (8, 11).

4. Physiology and pathophysiology of extracellular vesicle release

4.1. Angiogenesis

Angiogenesis is a critical process for many physiologic and pathologic processes. EVs have been shown to both promote and restrict angiogenesis (46-53) resulting in appropriate formation of new blood vessels to provide oxygen and nutrients to growing tissues and organs and allowing for elimination of metabolic waste (54). Endothelial cells release microvesicles containing the matrix metalloproteinases MMP-2 and MMP-9 allowing for degradation of extracellular matrix and formation of new capillaries (50). Microvesicles from platelets have been implicated in induction of angiogenesis by VEGF signaling and have also been shown to promote cell proliferation, survival, and migration in addition to capillary formation in vitro. Platelet microvesicles have been shown to promote revascularization via VEGF signaling in ischemic heart muscle of rats (51). VEGF is secreted upon platelet activation and associated with platelet-derived microvesicles. Platelet microvesicles have also been shown to regulate adhesion of cells. Platelet microvesicles are also able to transfer integrins and matrix metalloproteinases to cancer cells resulting in increased adherence to endothelial cells and subsequent metastasis and angiogenesis (55, 56). In vivo studies showed increased rates of metastasis with concomitant injection of lung cancer cells with platelet-derived microvesicles. Platelet-derived microvesicles induce expression of metalloproteinases, VEGF, hepatocyte growth factor, and interleukin-8 in lung cancer cells (56). EVs have also been shown to increase invasiveness of breast cancer cells (55). In addition, EVs derived from cancer cells have been shown to stimulate proliferation of epithelial cells. Exosomes from glioblastoma cells contain mRNAs and miRNAs that increase tumor growth and permit stromal remodeling (46). These exosomes are enriched in markers of glioma angiogenesis and increased malignancy including angiogenin, IL-6 and IL-8. In melanoma derived EVs, increased levels of the phosphorylated tyrosine kinase receptor MET are commonly seen (57). Transfer of phosphorylated MET to bone marrow cells via melanoma-derived exosomes has been documented in a mouse melanoma model (57). Overall EVs appear to play a critical role in stimulation of angiogenesis, cell proliferation, and cell survival.

4.2. Immunomodulation

EVs, particularly exosomes, have been shown to have immunomodulatory effects. Two classes of exosomal immune modulation are seen: immunostimulatory and immunosuppressive. Antigen presenting cells including dendritic cells, macrophages and B cells typically release immunostimulatory exosomes (29,58). These exosomes activate immune effector mechanisms such as cytotoxicity, T cell stimulation, and cytokine and antibody production (21). In activated T and NK cells endosomal vesicles of MVB carry cytotoxic molecules including perforin, granzyme, FasL, and TRAIL (59-61). In contrast, exosomes released from epithelial cells typically are immunosuppressive (62,63). Many tumor cells also downregulate immune response by release of immune receptor ligands and signaling molecules (59,64-67) on exosomes resulting in inhibition of the host immune system and promotion of tumor formation, progression, and metastasis (63,68-71). In mammalian pregnancy immunologic tolerance to the fetal allograft must be established to permit fetal development and growth (72). The placenta secretes immunomodulators to modify maternal immune responses and allow fetal survival during pregnancy. The predominant and unique cell type of the placenta, the syncytiotrophoblast, has been shown to release microvesicles and exosomes during pregnancy (73-76).

5. Extracellular vesicles in implantation and pregnancy

5.1. Endometrial extracellular vesicles

The uterine epithelium is a dynamic tissue that undergoes characteristic changes in morphology and function during the estrous or menstrual cycle in response to changing ovarian steroid hormones. Recent studies have confirmed that uterine epithelial cells also shed exosomes and microvesicles. The first report of this was by Habiba et al. (77). These authors reported the presence of a large glycoprotein, of approximately 200,000 MW in the endometrium of women. This protein was expressed in a cycle-specific fashion and showed changes in localization within the glandular and luminal epithelial cells depending on the stage of the cycle. The protein was shown to be contained in intracellular vesicles that moved to the apical edge of the cells during the midsecretory phase of the cycle. During the late secretory phase the protein was no longer intracytoplasmic but was expressed on the luminal border of the glandular epithelial cells and within the lumen. The authors hypothesized that this protein might be a member of the MUC-1 family and may be involved in uterine receptivity.

More recent studies have reported the isolation and characterization of exosomes and microvesicles from uterine luminal fluid of both women and sheep. Ng et al. (78) identified exosomes shed from uterine epithelial cells in vivo in women as well as from a cultured uterine epithethial cell line, ECC1. Uterine flushings and mucus were collected from patients and the exosomes and microvesicles isolated by differential ultracentrifugation. Immunostaining for tetraspanins, which are cell surface markers for exosomes, confirmed their presence on the apical surfaces of endometrial epithelial cells throughout the menstrual cycle though, interestingly, expression of specific proteins did vary across the cycle. The authors hypothesized that these EVs are released from uterine epithelial cells into the uterine lumen, and that they contain specific microRNAs that could be transferred to either neighboring uterine epithelial cells or to the trophectodermal cells of the blastocyst to promote implantation. MiRNA analysis of cultured uterine epithelial cells and exosomes was carried out and revealed that miRNA sorting into exosomes and microvesicles occurs. Several of the miRNAs identified were specific to EVs, while others were not present in these at all (Figure 3). The most abundant miRNAs in EVs were hsa-miR-200c, hsa-miR-17 and hsa-miR-106a. Bioinformatic analysis showed that these exosome-specific miRNAs have a number of potential targets in biological pathways highly relevant for embryo implantation such as inflammation, cell remodeling, proliferation and angiogenesis. These findings strongly support a role for EVs as a method of communication between the implanting embryo and the recipient endometrium.

Figure 3. Venn diagram comparing the miRNA profiles of exosomes versus the parent uterine epithelial cell line showing the number of shared and specific miRNAs (78).

Studies by Burns et al. (79) compared microvesicles and exosomes isolated from uterine luminal fluid of sheep at day 14 of the estrous cycle with those shed during pregnancy. These EVs were found to contain a number of mature miRNAs as well as endogenous retrovirus enJSRVs and gag RNAs that could be delivered to heterologous cells in vitro. Of note, the authors also found that the contents of the EVs in uterine luminal fluid of nonpregnant sheep differed significantly from those of uterine shedding vesicles of pregnant sheep (Figure 4). These results support a role for EVs from uterine epithelial cells as a vehicle to deliver enJSRVs RNA to the conceptus, which is important as enJSRVs regulate conceptus trophectoderm development. Moreover, these studies further confirm that uterine epithelial cells shed EVs containing specific miRNAs, RNAs and proteins into the uterine lumen and that these vesicles are taken up by the embryo.

Figure 4. Proteomic analysis of extracellular vesicles from uterine luminal fluid of cyclic and pregnant ewes reveals proteins that are unique to each reproductive state (79).

5.2. Regulation of extracellular vesicle release in uterine cells

The shedding of microvesicles and exosomes can be regulated thereby allowing for direct, carefully timed communication between the conceptus and maternal endometrium and also for paracrine interactions between the different cell types within the endometrium. However, the mechanisms by which this occurs in the uterus have only recently begun to be investigated using human uterine cell lines in vitro. Astudy by Braundmeier et al. (80) investigated some of the factors that might regulate shedding of EVs containing the protein EMMPRIN (Extracellular Matrix Metalloproteinase Inducer), a protein that stimulates production of metalloproteinases and coordinates extracellular matrix remodeling. These investigators found that the ovarian steroid hormone estradiol and the cytokine interleukin-1β both stimulated the shedding of EVs from uterine epithelial cells. In addition they found that, similar to cancer cell lines, activation of intracellular calcium pathways with the protein kinase C activator phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) also markedly increased the release of these vesicles. They further showed that shedding of EMMPRIN-containing microvesicles by uterine epithelial cells led to stimulation of uterine stromal cell MMP production.

Estradiol is required for and modulates many normal physiologic processes in the reproductive tract. Conventionally, estradiol action involves binding to either ERα or ERβ, encoded by ESR1 and ESR2 respectively, nuclear translocation and alteration of transcription. However, estradiol can also mediate rapid, non-genomic signaling events through activation of the seven pass transmembrane receptor GPR30, encoded by the GPER gene. In a recent study, Burnett and colleagues (81) investigated the potential role of GPR30 in regulating release of EMMPRIN-containing microvesicles from uterine epithelial cells (EEC) in vitro. They found that treatment of EEC cells with estradiol stimulated release of microvesicles containing EMMPRIN. Moreover, the increase in secretion of EMMPRIN-containing microvesicles appeared to occur via the G-protein coupled receptor GPR30 as treatment of EEC cells with the specific GPR30 agonist, G1, also stimulated release of EMMPRIN-containing microvesicles. This increase was not due to an increase in EMMPRIN mRNA transcription, but rather to movement of EMMPRIN protein to the plasma membrane. Treatment with the GPR30 antagonist G15 inhibited release of EMMPRIN-containing microvesicles in response to estradiol. In addition, treatment of cells with cholera toxin, a stimulator of adenylyl cyclase and cAMP production, also resulted in increased shedding of EMMPRIN-containing microvesicles. These results reveal a mechanism by which estradiol can stimulate release of EMMPRIN-containing microvesicles, not through its classical nuclear receptors but rather, through stimulation of the cell membrane receptor GPR30 and activation of stimulatory G proteins (Figure 5). More intensive investigations into the mechanisms by which shedding of EVs from uterine cells occurs and the factors that can stimulate or inhibit their release are clearly warranted.

Figure 5. Estradiol stimulates release of EMMPRIN-containing microvesicles from uterine epithelial cells through interaction with the G-protein coupled receptor GPR30. Activation of the receptor leads to activation of Gαs signaling pathways and subsequent microvesicle release (Burnett LA).

5.3. Extracellular vesicles from pre-implantation embryos

Communication between the uterine endometrium and implanting embryo is not a unidirectional process but involves active signaling from maternal cells to the embryo and vice versa. There is also active communication between embryos in litter bearing species such as the pig. Saadeldin et al. (82), using differential centrifugation and transmission electron microscopy, confirmed that porcine preimplantation embryos release exosomes and microvesicles. They also were able to demonstrate paracrine communication between different kinds of embryos such as parthenogenic and nuclear transfer embryos using a co-culture system. EVs from conditioned medium of parthenogenic embryos were taken up by nuclear transfer embryos and significantly improved their in vitro development. Analysis of these EVs identified a number of mRNAs including those of pluripotency genes such as Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, c-Myc and Nanog. Thus, embryos may utilize EVs as a means of communicating not only with the maternal endometrium but also with each other. This may explain the well-known phenomenon that embryos cultured in a group show improved development when compared to embryos cultured individually in vitro.

Two very recent studies have reported that bovine and human pre-implantation embryos secrete miRNAs into culture medium (83,84). These miRNAs are secreted within exosomes into the extracellular environment where they can be taken up by cells and act in a paracrine manner to impact gene expression. In the study by Rosenbluth et al. (83), human embryos cultured for in vitro fertilization (IVF) were found to secrete specific miRNAs that varied depending on the fertilization method used, their chromosomal state and whether they successfully implanted. The miRNA-191 was more abundant in conditioned medium from aneuploid embryos while miR-191, 372 and 645 were more highly concentrated in medium from embryos of failed IVF cycles. Kropp et al. (84) examined miRNA secretion in day 5-8 cultured bovine embryos. They observed differential miRNA expression between embryos that successfully developed to the blastocyst stage and those embryos that failed to develop from morulae to blastocysts or that degenerated. Four miRNAs-miR-25, -302c, 196a2 and -181 were found to be higher in culture medium from degenerating embryos. Human embryos also shed these miRNAs into medium. These findings demonstrate that secretion of specific miRNAs may be correlated with the developmental competence of an embryo and support the use of specific miRNAs as potential biomarkers for selecting the best quality embryos for successful pregnancy.

5.4. Placental trophoblast extracellular vesicles in normal pregnancy

Development and maturation of the placenta is a highly controlled process of trophoblast proliferation, differentiation and invasion into the maternal endometrium as well as remodeling of the spiral arteries to establish an adequate blood supply between the mother and fetus. During the first trimester of human pregnancy, the placental villi are covered by the inner mononuclear layer of cytotrophoblast. Cytotrophoblast progenitors in the placental villi can follow one of two different paths; some fuse and form multinucleated syncytiotrophoblast that overlies the cytotrophoblast layer, while others take on an invasive path differentiating into the extravillous trophoblast (EVT). During the invasion process, EVT grows out from the villous-forming cell columns and begins to migrate from the basement membrane of anchoring villi into the decidua ultimately reaching as far as the inner layer of myometrium and into the walls of the uterine spiral arteries. The syncytiotrophoblast layer has a barrier function in the human placenta and substantially increases the surface area available for nutrient exchange between the mother and fetus. The extravillous-derived trophoblast cells play an important role in spiral artery remodeling participating in the degradation of extracellular matrix and disruption of endothelial cells/matrix/vascular smooth muscle cell interactions. Late in the first trimester of pregnancy such active EVT invasion results in conversion of low-flow, high-resistance into high-flow, low resistance spiral arteries with increased circumference and vascular compliance. Such vessel restructuring is necessary to ensure a sufficient blood supply for fetal development. Thus, the trophoblast cells of the implanting conceptus must interact and communicate with the various cell types in the uterus to ensure successful placental development, vasculogenesis and maternal tolerance of the fetal allograft.

A number of studies have confirmed that trophoblast cells shed both exosomes and microvesicles. Earlier reports described these EVs as trophoblastic debris but more recently these vesicles have been recognized as a means by which trophoblast cells communicate with other cells locally in their surrounding microenvironment as well as systemically (85-90). Proteomic studies reported the presence of a large number of proteins, including EMMPRIN, in exosomes derived from Swan71 human first trimester trophoblast cell line (85) and showed that these trophoblast-derived exosomes are able to mediate monocyte recruitment and differentiation. The authors of these studies distinguished trophoblast-derived EVs as exosomes based on the presence of exosome marker proteins and on their morphology and density (38, 85-87). However, results from other studies indicate that trophoblast cells also release microvesicles though plasma membrane blebbing (85,88-90). Atay et al. (85) identified 282 proteins in EVs isolated from trophoblast cells. Of these proteins, 147 had not previously been described in exosomes but instead were shown to be concentrated in the plasma membrane of microvesicles.

EMMPRIN released in microvesicles by trophoblast cells may contribute to the process of spiral artery remodeling during early placental development. Previous studies have shown that bioactive EMMPRIN is released from the surface of tumor cells into conditioned medium through microvesicle shedding (91). Other investigators reported that EMMPRIN is expressed in microvesicles derived from epithelial ovarian cancer cells and that these microvesicles induce angiogenesis and promote matrix metalloproteinase gene expression in endothelial HUVEC cells in an EMMPRIN-dependent fashion (92). Alcazar et al. (93) using proteomic analysis showed the presence of EMMPRIN in microvesicles derived from human retinal pigment epithelium. EMMPRIN has also been shown to increase vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production and HIF1α expression in synovial fibroblasts (94) and VEGF and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) production in renal carcinoma cell lines (95). A recent report from Lee and colleagues (96) determined that EMMPRIN is also an important regulator of proliferation, invasion and MMP production in primary human cytotrophoblasts isolated from the first trimester of pregnancy. Trophoblast cells secrete a multitude of mRNAs and biologically active proteins in extracellular vesicles that regulate angiogenesis, tissue remodeling and growth of the placenta. These include miRNAs, cytokines, growth factors, and receptors such as human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG/LH) receptor, TGFβ, Flt-1, and endoglin (72, 97-105) (summarized in Figure 6).

Figure 6.Examples of some of the proteins and RNAs shed in exosomes and microvesicles by placental trophoblast cells (Adapted with permission from 72).

5.5. Placental trophoblast extracellular vesicles and immune function

Another very important function of the placental trophoblast cells is to interact with the maternal immune system in early pregnancy to activate immune cells while inducing immunosuppression and tolerance for the fetal allograft at later stages (72,85-87,97). The first and early second trimesters of pregnancy resemble ‘wound healing,’ requiring a pro-inflammatory environment for embryo implantation, trophoblast invasion, angiogenesis and endometrial remodeling and repair. This pro-inflammatory phase of early pregnancy is characterized by the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-8, and monocyte chemoattractant factor-1 (MCP1) and their appearance in the maternal circulation (86,87,106). IL-1β promotes multiple early pregnancy events, such as attraction and activation of immune cells, stimulation of endothelial cell adhesion molecules expression, and enhanced expression of extracellular matrix proteins and MMPs. Previous work (38,86,107) demonstrated that exosomes derived from first trimester extravillous trophoblast were capable of inducing the migration of monocytes and ‘educating’ these cells to produce pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-1β.

While the first trimester of pregnancy is associated with an increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines to recruit and activate immune effector cells, the second trimester is an anti-inflammatory or Th-2 state in which the trophoblast cells must act to protect the fetus against maternal immune attack. These trophoblast cells express membrane-associated and secreted immunoregulatory factors including FasL and early pregnancy factor (EPF) that block lytic NK cell activity as well as a number of cytokines such as TGF-β and IL-10 that prevent Th1 helper type cells but enhance Th2 and regulatory T cell functions (67,72,76,108-110). Abrahams et al. (76) reported that isolated trophoblast cells from the first trimester of pregnancy lacked plasma membrane–associated FasL but expressed cytoplasmic FasL that was secreted in microvesicles. Studies by Abrahams et al. (76) and Frangsmyr et al. (59) also confirmed that trophoblast cells from first-trimester pregnancies lack expression of FasL in the cell membrane and exosomes released from these first-trimester trophoblast cells do not express FasL on their exterior, but do contain FasL within. This intracellular FasL, when released from microvesicles as they undergo degradation, is able to induce T-cell through apoptosis. In contrast, while membranal FasL could be detected on the plasma membrane of trophoblast cells from second-and third-trimester pregnancies, it was not contained in exosomes derived from these trophoblasts. Thus, the composition of exosomes and microvesicles shed by trophoblast cells varies depending on the gestational age resulting in quite distinct effects on target immune cells at different stages of pregnancy.

Envelope glycoproteins of human endogenous retrovirus (HERV), such as syncytin 1 (HERV-W), are highly expressed in the placenta and are shed in trophoblast microvesicles during pregnancy (111). Treatment of peripheral blood mononuclear cells with either recombinant syncytin 1 or microvesicles from cultured BeWo trophoblast cells induced peripheral blood mononuclear cell activation and secretion of a number of cytokines including IL-2, IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα). Conversely, siRNA knockdown of syncytin 1 expression in BeWo cells inhibited such activation. These findings support a role for trophoblast-derived syncytin 1 and other HERV-W envelope glycoproteins in modulation of the maternal immune system during pregnancy.

5.6. Identification of RNAs in trophoblast-derived extracellular vesicles

One of the most intriguing aspects of trophoblast-derived exosomes is that they contain mRNAs and miRNAs (112-115). This allows for exchange of genetic information between trophoblast cells and specific maternal target cells in the uterus providing more direct control of maternal gene expression and cell function by trophoblast cells (96,107,116,117). Several recent studies have characterized the miRNA profiles for human placenta at different stages of pregnancy (113,115,118). Donker et al. (118) and Luo et al. (115) analyzed human first trimester and term placental tissues and demonstrated that most placenta-specific miRNAs, including MIR517A, were linked to a miRNA cluster on chromosome 19. These miRNA cluster genes were upregulated during placental development. They identified four novel miRNAs that were only expressed in the placenta. Several placenta specific miRNAs have been identified in maternal plasma confirming that the syncytiotrophoblast cells of the placenta secrete miRNAs into the maternal circulation via exosomes. In vitro studies using the BeWo trophoblast cell line as a model for villous trophoblast demonstrated that these cells released exosomes containing two placenta-specific miRNAs, MIR517A and MIR21, into the culture medium (115). Proteome analysis suggested that MIR17A might be involved in the regulation of TNF signal transduction. Esplin et al. (103) characterized and compared trophoblast-derived exosomes in the peripheral blood of pregnant women that completed normal-term pregnancies with those of women who had a preterm delivery. They found that the concentration of these exosomes was elevated in the blood of women with normal pregnancies delivering at term in comparison with preterm delivery and non-pregnant women. It is important to better characterize the placental miRNA profiles of trophoblast-derived exosomes in women with normal and pathologic pregnancies such as preeclampsia, as well as at different stages of gestation. Such studies will likely identify characteristic miRNA signatures that can be used to predict pregnancy outcomes or perhaps for prenatal testing. More functional studies are also needed to determine the mechanisms by which trophoblast-specific mRNAs and miRNAs direct the functions of maternal cells to favor survival of the fetal allograft.

6. Extracellular vesicles and gestational vascular disease

Vascular complications of pregnancy including gestational hypertension and preeclampsia/toxemia are a significant cause of maternal morbidity and fetal mortality. Preeclampsia is characterized by poor placentation and endothelial damage (119, 120) resulting in multi-organ dysfunction via arterial hypertension including glomerular pathology and hepatic failure (121). Key features of this disease include disruption of angiogenesis and increase in inflammatory cytokines resulting in impaired maternal endothelial function and disturbance in utero placental circulation (122). This increase in maternal inflammatory response and vascular dysfunction alters the progression of placentation, trophoblast proliferation, invasion, and apoptosis.

Trophoblast cells comprise the maternal-fetal interface. Proper migration, invasion, and differentiation of these cells is critical for placentation, embryo implantation, and hemostasis. Differentiation and fusion of trophoblasts to form multinucleate syncytiotrophoblasts require activation of caspases and subsequent upregulation of Bcl-2 after fusion to prevent apoptosis (123). EVs present in blood have been shown to increase in vascular disease states (124). In preeclampsia, microvesicles released from red blood cells and endothelial cells are increased consistent with other vascular pathologies (125).

Although the total number of circulating microvesicles remains similar in normal healthy pregnancies compared to those with gestational trophoblastic disease, those released in gestational vascular disease contain more proinflammatory cytokines and more pro-and antiangiogenic proteins (119,122,126,127). Shomer et al. (119) showed differential effects when endothelial, early stage trophoblast, and term trophoblast cells are exposed to circulating microvesicles from normal healthy pregnant women compared to those with gestational vascular disease. In human umbilical vein endothelial cells exposure to microvesicles from normal healthy pregnancies results in stable endothelial tube formation -- this does not occur in response to microvesicles from women with gestational vascular disease suggesting a role for microvesicles in endothelial cell migration and angiogenesis during pregnancy. Survival of early stage trophoblast cells increases with exposure to normal healthy pregnancy microvesicles suggesting a role for microvesicles in maintenance of endothelial and trophoblast function. Increased migration via the erk2 pathway is also seen in response to normal healthy pregnancy microvesicles compared to microvesicles released from women with gestational vascular disease. This impairment in endothelial and early stage placental cell function may be related to failure of placental implantation seen in gestational vascular disease. In term trophoblast cells exposure to microvesicles from women with gestational vascular disease results in significantly higher rates of apoptosis compared to that seen with microvesicles from normal healthy pregnancies suggesting a role for microvesicles in trophoblast apoptosis and placental aging.

In a normal healthy pregnancy a low level of trophoblastic apoptosis is observed early in pregnancy which increases as a function of gestational age. In contrast, preeclampsia is characterized by higher rates of trophoblastic apoptosis that may result in abnormal placental invasion and potentially lead to pregnancy loss and/or early delivery. In preterm labor prostaglandins and proinflammatory cytokines are known to be increased (128). Increased trophoblastic apoptosis stimulated by microvesicles released in gestational vascular disease states may increase inflammatory cytokines and serve as putative mechanism for initiation of preterm labor. EVs clearly play an important role in the angiogenesis, inflammation, and apoptosis that determines the endothelial and trophoblast function during pregnancy.

7. Summary and future directions

Knowledge of intercellular communication via EVs has resulted in a more robust understanding of the physiology and pathophysiology of many processes including angiogenesis, immunomodulation, and cell survival. Many of these processes are critical to development and delivery of a successful pregnancy. Uterine, placental, and embryonic EVs are being studied to better understand the role of these vesicles in uterine receptivity, placentation, and gestation. Further elucidation of the precise mechanisms regulating EV creation, release, and actions in reproductive tissues is needed to understand the complex physiology and pathophysiology of pregnancy.

A more robust understanding of angiogenesis, immunomodulation, and cell survival in pregnancy as regulated by EVs will likely lead to better understanding of pathophysiologic conditions in pregnancy including implantation failure, abnormal placentation, and gestational vascular disease. Understanding of these processes is critical to developing novel treatment modalities to modify EV release and function.

References

    1. Y Yuana, A Sturk and R Nieuwland: Extracellular vesicles in physiological and pathological conditions. Blood Rev, 27(1), 31-9 (2013)

    2. B Gyorgy, TG Szabo, M Pasztoi, Z Pal, P Misjak, B Aradi, V Laszlo, E Pallinger, E Pap, A Kittel, G Nagy, A Falus and EI Buzas: Membrane vesicles, current state-of-the-art: emerging role of extracellular vesicles. Cell Mol Life Sci, 68(16), 2667-88 (2011)

    3. E van der Pol, AN Boing, P Harrison, A Sturk and R Nieuwland: Classification, functions, and clinical relevance of extracellular vesicles. Pharmacol Rev, 64(3), 676-705 (2012)

    4. SM van Dommelen, P Vader, S Lakhal, SA Kooijmans, WW van Solinge, MJ Wood and RM Schiffelers: Microvesicles and exosomes: opportunities for cell-derived membrane vesicles in drug delivery. J Control Release, 161(2), 635-44 (2012)

    5. S Mathivanan and RJ Simpson: ExoCarta: A compendium of exosomal proteins and RNA. Proteomics, 9(21), 4997-5000 (2009)

    6. RJ Simpson, SS Jensen and JW Lim: Proteomic profiling of exosomes: current perspectives. Proteomics, 8(19), 4083-99 (2008)

    7. H Valadi, K Ekstrom, A Bossios, M Sjostrand, JJ Lee and JO Lotvall: Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat Cell Biol, 9(6), 654-9 (2007)

    8. E Cocucci, G Racchetti and J Meldolesi: Shedding microvesicles: artefacts no more. Trends Cell Biol, 19(2), 43-51 (2009)

    9. MC Deregibus, V Cantaluppi, R Calogero, M Lo Iacono, C Tetta, L Biancone, S Bruno, B Bussolati and G Camussi: Endothelial progenitor cell derived microvesicles activate an angiogenic program in endothelial cells by a horizontal transfer of mRNA. Blood, 110(7), 2440-8 (2007)

    10. J Ratajczak, M Wysoczynski, F Hayek, A Janowska-Wieczorek and MZ Ratajczak: Membrane-derived microvesicles: important and underappreciated mediators of cell-to-cell communication. Leukemia, 20(9), 1487-95 (2006)

    11. M Baj-Krzyworzeka, R Szatanek, K Weglarczyk, J Baran, B Urbanowicz, P Branski, MZ Ratajczak and M Zembala: Tumour-derived microvesicles carry several surface determinants and mRNA of tumour cells and transfer some of these determinants to monocytes. Cancer Immunol Immunother, 55(7), 808-18 (2006)

    12. W Losche, T Scholz, U Temmler, V Oberle and RA Claus: Platelet-derived microvesicles transfer tissue factor to monocytes but not to neutrophils. Platelets, 15(2), 109-15 (2004)

    13. R Safaei, BJ Larson, TC Cheng, MA Gibson, S Otani, W Naerdemann and SB Howell: Abnormal lysosomal trafficking and enhanced exosomal export of cisplatin in drug-resistant human ovarian carcinoma cells. Mol Cancer Ther, 4(10), 1595-604 (2005)

    14. K Shedden, XT Xie, P Chandaroy, YT Chang and GR Rosania: Expulsion of small molecules in vesicles shed by cancer cells: association with gene expression and chemosensitivity profiles. Cancer Res, 63(15), 4331-7 (2003)

    15. K Al-Nedawi, B Meehan, RS Kerbel, AC Allison and J Rak: Endothelial expression of autocrine VEGF upon the uptake of tumor-derived microvesicles containing oncogenic EGFR. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 106(10), 3794-9 (2009)

    16. HF Heijnen, AE Schiel, R Fijnheer, HJ Geuze and JJ Sixma: Activated platelets release two types of membrane vesicles: microvesicles by surface shedding and exosomes derived from exocytosis of multivesicular bodies and alpha-granules. Blood, 94(11), 3791-9 (1999)

    17. O Morel, L Jesel, JM Freyssinet and F Toti: Cellular mechanisms underlying the formation of circulating microparticles. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, 31(1), 15-26 (2011)

    18. R Nieuwland: Cellular origin of microparticles exposing tissue factor in cancer: a mixed double? J Thromb Haemost, 6(9), 1514-6 (2008)

    19. AP Owens, 3rd and N Mackman: Microparticles in hemostasis and thrombosis. Circ Res, 108(10), 1284-97 (2011)

    20. K Schara, V Jansa, V Sustar, D Dolinar, JI Pavlic, M Lokar, V Kralj-Iglic, P Veranic and A Iglic: Mechanisms for the formation of membranous nanostructures in cell-to-cell communication. Cell Mol Biol Lett, 14(4), 636-56 (2009)

    21. C Thery, M Ostrowski and E Segura: Membrane vesicles as conveyors of immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol, 9(8), 581-93 (2009)

    22. AV Vlassov, S Magdaleno, R Setterquist and R Conrad: Exosomes: current knowledge of their composition, biological functions, and diagnostic and therapeutic potentials. Biochim Biophys Acta, 1820(7), 940-8 (2012)

    23. K Denzer, MJ Kleijmeer, HF Heijnen, W Stoorvogel and HJ Geuze: Exosome: from internal vesicle of the multivesicular body to intercellular signaling device. J Cell Sci, 113 Pt 19, 3365-74 (2000)

    24. RF Zwaal and AJ Schroit: Pathophysiologic implications of membrane phospholipid asymmetry in blood cells. Blood, 89(4), 1121-32 (1997)

    25. K Trajkovic, C Hsu, S Chiantia, L Rajendran, D Wenzel, F Wieland, P Schwille, B Brugger and M Simons: Ceramide triggers budding of exosome vesicles into multivesicular endosomes. Science, 319(5867), 1244-7

    26. JH Hurley, E Boura, LA Carlson and B Rozycki: Membrane budding. Cell, 143(6), 875-87 (2010)

    27. JH Hurley and PI Hanson: Membrane budding and scission by the ESCRT machinery: it’s all in the neck. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 11(8), 556-66 (2010)

    28. A Savina, M Furlan, M Vidal and MI Caolombo: Exosome release is regulated by a calcium-dependent mechanism in K562 cells. J Biol Chem, 278(22), 20083-90 (2003)

    29. C Thery, A Regnault, J Garin, J Wolfers, L Zitvogel, P Ricciardi-Castagnoli, G Raposo and S Amigorena: Molecular characterization of dendritic cell-derived exosomes. Selective accumulation of the heat shock protein hsc73. J Cell Biol, 147(3), 599-610 (1999)

    30. G van Niel, G Raposo, C Candalh, M Boussac, R Hershberg, N Cerf-Bensussan and M Heyman: Intestinal epithelial cells secrete exosome-like vesicles. Gastroenterology, 121(2), 337-49 (2001)

    31. N Blanchard, D Lankar, F Faure, A Regnault, C Dumont, G Raposo and C Hivroz: TCR activation of human T cells induces the production of exosomes bearing the TCR/CD3/zeta complex. J Immunol, 168(7), 3235-41 (2002)

    32. G Raposo, D Tenza, S Mecheri, R Peronet, C Bonnerot and C Desaymard: Accumulation of major histocompatibility complex class II molecules in mast cell secretory granules and their release upon degranulation. Mol Biol Cell, 8(12), 2631-45 (1997)

    33. RM Johnstone, M Adam, JR Hammond, L Orr and C Turbide: Vesicle formation during reticulocyte maturation. Association of plasma membrane activities with released vesicles (exosomes). J Biol Chem, 262(19), 9412-20 (1987)

    34. S Pant, H Hilton and ME Burczynski: The multifaceted exosome: biogenesis, role in normal and aberrant cellular function, and frontiers for pharmacological and biomarker opportunities. Biochem Pharmacol, 83(11), 1484-94 (2012)

    35. M Record, C Subra, S Silvente-Poirot and M Poirot: Exosomes as intercellular signalosomes and pharmacological effectors. Biochem Pharmacol, 81(10), 1171-82 (2011)

    36. SA Bellingham, BB Guo, BM Coleman and AF Hill: Exosomes: vehicles for the transfer of toxic proteins associated with neurodegenerative diseases? Front Physiol, 3, 124 (2012)

    37. C Lasser, M Eldh and J Lotvall: Isolation and characterization of RNA-containing exosomes. J Vis Exp (59), e3037 (2012)

    38. DD Taylor and C Gercel-Taylor: Exosomes/microvesicles: mediators of cancer-associated immunosuppressive microenvironments. Semin Immunopathol, 33(5), 441-54 (2011)

    39. J Conde-Vancells, E Rodriguez-Suarez, N Embade, D Gil, R Matthiesen, M Valle, F Elortza, SC Lu, JM Mato and JM Falcon-Perez: Characterization and comprehensive proteome profiling of exosomes secreted by hepatocytes. J Proteome Res, 7(12), 5157-66 (2008)

    40. C Subra, D Grand, K Laulagnier, A Stella, G Lambeau, M Paillasse, P De Medina, B Monsarrat, B Perret, S Silvente-Poirot, M Poirot and M Record: Exosomes account for vesicle-mediated transcellular transport of activatable phospholipases and prostaglandins. J Lipid Res, 51(8), 2105-20 (2010)

    41. O Moskovich and Z Fishelson: Live cell imaging of outward and inward vesiculation induced by the complement c5b-9 complex. J Biol Chem, 282(41), 29977-86 (2007)

    42. I Del Conde, CN Shrimpton, P Thiagarajan and JA Lopez: Tissue-factor-bearing microvesicles arise from lipid rafts and fuse with activated platelets to initiate coagulation. Blood, 106(5), 1604-11 (2005)

    43. A Piccin, WG Murphy and OP Smith: Circulating microparticles: pathophysiology and clinical implications. Blood Rev, 21(3), 157-71 (2007)

    44. U Salzer, P Hinterdorfer, U Hunger, C Borken and R Prohaska: Ca(++)-dependent vesicle release from erythrocytes involves stomatin-specific lipid rafts, synexin (annexin VII), and sorcin. Blood, 99(7), 2569-77 (2002)

    45. FI Hawari, FN Rouhani, X Cui, Z. X Yu, C Buckley, M Kaler and SJ Levine: Release of full-length 55-kDa TNF receptor 1 in exosome-like vesicles: a mechanism for generation of soluble cytokine receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 101(5), 1297-302 (2004)

    46. J Skog, T Wurdinger, S van Rijn, DH Meijer, L Gainche, M Sena-Esteves, WT Curry, Jr., BS Carter, AM Krichevsky and X O Breakefield: Glioblastoma microvesicles transport RNA and proteins that promote tumour growth and provide diagnostic biomarkers. Nat Cell Biol, 10(12), 1470-6 (2008)

    47. C Yang, BR Mwaikambo, T Zhu, C Gagnon, J Lafleur, S Seshadri, P Lachapelle, JC Lavoie, S Chemtob and P Hardy: Lymphocytic microparticles inhibit angiogenesis by stimulating oxidative stress and negatively regulating VEGF-induced pathways. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol, 294(2), R467-76 (2008)

    48. M Wysoczynski and MZ Ratajczak: Lung cancer secreted microvesicles: underappreciated modulators of microenvironment in expanding tumors. Int J Cancer, 125(7), 1595-603 (2009)

    49. HA Mostefai, R Andriantsitohaina and MC Martinez: Plasma membrane microparticles in angiogenesis: role in ischemic diseases and in cancer. Physiol Res, 57 (3), 311-20 (2008)

    50. HK Kim, KS Song, JH Chung, KR Lee and SN Lee: Platelet microparticles induce angiogenesis in vitro. Br J Haematol, 124(3), 376-84 (2004)

    51. A Brill, O Dashevsky, J Rivo, Y Gozal and D Varon: Platelet-derived microparticles induce angiogenesis and stimulate post-ischemic revascularization. Cardiovasc Res, 67(1), 30-8 (2005)

    52. CM Boulanger and A Tedgui: Dying for attention: microparticles and angiogenesis. Cardiovasc Res, 67(1), 1-3 (2005)

    53. R Bonavia, MM Inda, S Vandenberg, SY Cheng, M Nagane, P Hadwiger, P Tan, DW Sah, WK Cavenee and FB Furnari: EGFRvIII promotes glioma angiogenesis and growth through the NF-kappaB, interleukin-8 pathway. Oncogene, 31(36), 4054-66 (2012)

    54. B Bussolati, C Grange and G Camussi: Tumor exploits alternative strategies to achieve vascularization. FASEB J, 25(9), 2874-82 (2011)

    55. A Janowska-Wieczorek, LA Marquez-Curtis, M Wysoczynski and MZ Ratajczak: Enhancing effect of platelet-derived microvesicles on the invasive potential of breast cancer cells. Transfusion, 46(7), 1199-209 (2006)

    56. A Janowska-Wieczorek, M Wysoczynski, J Kijowski, L Marquez-Curtis, B Machalinski, J Ratajczak and MZ Ratajczak: Microvesicles derived from activated platelets induce metastasis and angiogenesis in lung cancer. Int J Cancer, 113(5), 752-60 (2005)

    57. H Peinado, M Aleckovic, S Lavotshkin, I Matei, B Costa-Silva, G Moreno-Bueno, M Hergueta-Redondo, C Williams, G Garcia-Santos, C Ghajar, A Nitadori-Hoshino, C Hoffman, K Badal, BA Garcia, MK Callahan, J Yuan, VR Martins, J Skog, RN Kaplan, MS Brady, JD Wolchok, PB Chapman, Y Kang, J Bromberg and D Lyden: Melanoma exosomes educate bone marrow progenitor cells toward a pro-metastatic phenotype through MET. Nat Med, 18(6), 883-91 (2012)

    58. G Raposo, HW Nijman, W Stoorvogel, R Liejendekker, CV Harding, CJ Melief and HJ Geuze: B lymphocytes secrete antigen-presenting vesicles. J Exp Med, 183(3), 1161-72 (1996)

    59. L Frangsmyr, V Baranov, O Nagaeva, U Stendahl, L Kjellberg and L Mincheva-Nilsson: Cytoplasmic microvesicular form of Fas ligand in human early placenta: switching the tissue immune privilege hypothesis from cellular to vesicular level. Mol Hum Reprod, 11(1), 35-41 (2005)

    60. L Mincheva-Nilsson, O Nagaeva, KG Sundqvist, ML Hammarstrom, S Hammarstrom and V Baranov: gammadelta T cells of human early pregnancy decidua: evidence for cytotoxic potency. Int Immunol, 12(5), 585-96 (2000)

    61. MJ Martinez-Lorenzo, A Anel, S Gamen, I Monlen, P Lasierra, L Larrad, A Pineiro, MA Alava and J Naval: Activated human T cells release bioactive Fas ligand and APO2 ligand in microvesicles. J Immunol, 163(3), 1274-81 (1999)

    62. M Karlsson, S Lundin, U Dahlgren, H Kahu, I Pettersson and E Telemo: “Tolerosomes” are produced by intestinal epithelial cells. Eur J Immunol, 31(10), 2892-900 (2001)

    63. A Clayton, JP Mitchell, J Court, MD Mason and Z Tabi: Human tumor-derived exosomes selectively impair lymphocyte responses to interleukin-2. Cancer Res, 67(15), 7458-66 (2007)

    64. DD Taylor, S Akyol and C Gercel-Taylor: Pregnancy-associated exosomes and their modulation of T cell signaling. J Immunol, 176(3), 1534-42 (2006)

    65. A Sabapatha, C Gercel-Taylor and DD Taylor: Specific isolation of placenta-derived exosomes from the circulation of pregnant women and their immunoregulatory consequences. Am J Reprod Immunol, 56(5-6), 345-55 (2006)

    66. L Mincheva-Nilsson, O Nagaeva, T Chen, U Stendahl, J Antsiferova, I Mogren, J Hernestal and V Baranov: Placenta-derived soluble MHC class I chain-related molecules down-regulate NKG2D receptor on peripheral blood mononuclear cells during human pregnancy: a possible novel immune escape mechanism for fetal survival. J Immunol, 176(6), 3585-92 (2006)

    67. M Hedlund, AC Stenqvist, O Nagaeva, L Kjellberg, M Wulff, V Baranov and L Mincheva-Nilsson: Human placenta expresses and secretes NKG2D ligands via exosomes that down-modulate the cognate receptor expression: evidence for immunosuppressive function. J Immunol, 183(1), 340-51 (2009)

    68. J Wolfers, A Lozier, G Raposo, A Regnault, C Thery, C Masurier, C Flament, S Pouzieux, F Faure, T Tursz, E Angevin, S Amigorena and L Zitvogel: Tumor-derived exosomes are a source of shared tumor rejection antigens for CTL cross-priming. Nat Med, 7(3), 297-303 (2001)

    69. V Huber, S Fais, M Iero, L Lugini, P Canese, P Squarcina, A Zaccheddu, M Colone, G Arancia, M Gentile, E Seregni, R Valenti, G Ballabio, F Belli, E Leo, G Parmiani and L Rivoltini: Human colorectal cancer cells induce T-cell death through release of proapoptotic microvesicles: role in immune escape. Gastroenterology, 128(7), 1796-804 (2005)

    70. G Andreola, L Rivoltini, C Castelli, V Huber, P Perego, P Deho, P Squarcina, P Accornero, F Lozupone, L Lugini, A Stringaro, A Molinari, G Arancia, M Gentile, G Parmiani and S Fais: Induction of lymphocyte apoptosis by tumor cell secretion of FasL-bearing microvesicles. J Exp Med, 195(10), 1303-16 (2002)

    71. R Valenti, V Huber, M Iero, P Filipazzi, G Parmiani and L Rivoltini: Tumor-released microvesicles as vehicles of immunosuppression. Cancer Res, 67(7), 2912-5 (2007)

    72. L Mincheva-Nilsson and V Baranov: The role of placental exosomes in reproduction. Am J Reprod Immunol, 63(6), 520-33 (2010)

    73. S Guller: Role of the syncytium in placenta-mediated complications of preeclampsia. Thromb Res, 124(4), 389-92 (2009)

    74. B Toth, CA Lok, A Boing, M Diamant, JA van der Post, K Friese and R Nieuwland: Microparticles and exosomes: impact on normal and complicated pregnancy. Am J Reprod Immunol, 58(5), 389-402 (2007)

    75. CW Redman and IL Sargent: Microparticles and immunomodulation in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. J Reprod Immunol, 76(1-2), 61-7 (2007)

    76. VM Abrahams, SL Straszewski-Chavez, S Guller and G Mor: First trimester trophoblast cells secrete Fas ligand which induces immune cell apoptosis. Mol Hum Reprod, 10(1), 55-63 (2004)

    77. MA Habiba, RF James, SC Bell and F Al-Azzawi: Identification of a cycle-modulated 200-kDa endometrial antigen by a monoclonal antibody LDS60. J Immunol Methods, 227(1-2), 65-73 (1999)

    78. YH Ng, S Rome, A Jalabert, A Forterre, H Singh, CL Hincks and LA Salamonsen: Endometrial exosomes/microvesicles in the uterine microenvironment: a new paradigm for embryo-endometrial cross talk at implantation. PLoS One, 8(3), e58502 (2013)

    79. G Burns, K Brooks, M Wildung, R Navakanitworakul, LK Christenson and TE Spencer: Extracellular vesicles in luminal fluid of the ovine uterus. PLoS One, 9(3), e90913 (2014)

    80. AG Braundmeier, CA Dayger, P Mehrotra, RJ Belton, Jr. and RA Nowak: EMMPRIN is secreted by human uterine epithelial cells in microvesicles and stimulates metalloproteinase production by human uterine fibroblast cells. Reprod Sci, 19(12), 1292-301 (2012)

    81. LA Burnett, MM Light, P Mehrotra and RA Nowak: Stimulation of GPR30 increases release of EMMPRIN-containing microvesicles in human uterine epithelial cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 97(12), 4613-22 (2012)

    82. IM Saadeldin, SJ Kim, YB Choi and BC Lee: Improvement of cloned embryos development by co-culturing with parthenotes: a possible role of exosomes/microvesicles for embryos paracrine communication. Cell Reprogram, 16(3), 223-34 (2014)

    83. EM Rosenbluth, DN Shelton, LM Wells, AE Sparks and BJ Van Voorhis: Human embryos secrete microRNAs into culture media--a potential biomarker for implantation. Fertil Steril, 101(5), 1493-500 (2014)

    84. J Kropp, SM Salih and H Khatib: Expression of microRNAs in bovine and human pre-implantation embryo culture media. Front Genet, 5, 91 (2014)

    85. S Atay, C Gercel-Taylor, M Kesimer and DD Taylor: Morphologic and proteomic characterization of exosomes released by cultured extravillous trophoblast cells. Exp Cell Res, 317(8), 1192-202 (2011)

    86. S Atay, C Gercel-Taylor, J Suttles, G Mor and DD Taylor: Trophoblast-derived exosomes mediate monocyte recruitment and differentiation. Am J Reprod Immunol, 65(1), 65-77 (2011)

    87. S Atay, C Gercel-Taylor and DD Taylor: Human trophoblast-derived exosomal fibronectin induces pro-inflammatory IL-1beta production by macrophages. Am J Reprod Immunol, 66(4), 259-69 (2011)

    88. S Baig, JY Lim, AZ Fernandis, MR Wenk, A Kale, LL Su, A Biswas, S Vasoo, G Shui and M Choolani: Lipidomic analysis of human placental syncytiotrophoblast microvesicles in adverse pregnancy outcomes. Placenta, 34(5), 436-42 (2013)

    89. CW Redman, DS Tannetta, RA Dragovic, C Gardiner, JH Southcombe, GP Collett and IL Sargent: Review: Does size matter? Placental debris and the pathophysiology of pre-eclampsia. Placenta, 33 Suppl, S48-54 (2012)

    90. RA Dragovic, C Gardiner, AS Brooks, DS Tannetta, DJ Ferguson, P Hole, B Carr, CW Redman, AL Harris, PJ Dobson, P Harrison and IL Sargent: Sizing and phenotyping of cellular vesicles using Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis. Nanomedicine, 7(6), 780-8 (2011)

    91. SS Sidhu, AT Mengistab, AN Tauscher, J LaVail and C Basbaum: The microvesicle as a vehicle for EMMPRIN in tumor-stromal interactions. Oncogene, 23(4), 956-63 (2004)

    92. D Millimaggi, M Mari, S D’Ascenzo, E Carosa, EA Jannini, S Zucker, G Carta, A Pavan and V Dolo: Tumor vesicle-associated CD147 modulates the angiogenic capability of endothelial cells. Neoplasia, 9(4), 349-57 (2007)

    93. O Alcazar, AM Hawkridge, TS Collier, SW Cousins, SK Bhattacharya, DC Muddiman and ME Marin-Castano: Proteomics characterization of cell membrane blebs in human retinal pigment epithelium cells. Mol Cell Proteomics, 8(10), 2201-11 (2009)

    94. CH Wang, H Yao, L N. Chen, JF Jia, L Wang, JY Dai, ZH Zheng, ZN Chen and P Zhu: CD147 induces angiogenesis through a vascular endothelial growth factor and hypoxia-inducible transcription factor 1alpha-mediated pathway in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum, 64(6), 1818-27 (2012)

    95. M Sato, Y Nakai, W Nakata, T Yoshida, K Hatano, A Kawashima, K Fujita, M Uemura, H Takayama and N Nonomura: EMMPRIN promotes angiogenesis, proliferation, invasion and resistance to sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma, and its level predicts patient outcome. PLoS One, 8(9), e74313 (2013)

    96. Y Lee, S El Andaloussi and MJ Wood: Exosomes and microvesicles: extracellular vesicles for genetic information transfer and gene therapy. Hum Mol Genet, 21(R1), R125-34 (2012)

    97. LW Chamley, OJ Holland, Q Chen, CA Viall, PR Stone and M Abumaree: Review: where is the maternofetal interface? Placenta, 35 Suppl, S74-80 (2014)

    98. F Shen, J Wei, S Snowise, J DeSousa, P Stone, C Viall, Q Chen and L Chamley: Trophoblast debris extruded from preeclamptic placentae activates endothelial cells: A mechanism by which the placenta communicates with the maternal endothelium. Placenta, 35(10), 839-47 (2014)

    99. DS Tannetta, RA Dragovic, C Gardiner, CW Redman and IL Sargent: Characterisation of syncytiotrophoblast vesicles in normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia: expression of Flt-1 and endoglin. PLoS One, 8(2), e56754 (2013)

    100. AE Chambers, PF Stanley, H Randeva and S Banerjee: Microvesicle-mediated release of soluble LH/hCG receptor (LHCGR) from transfected cells and placenta explants. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 9, 64 (2011)

    101. LW Chamley, Q Chen, J Ding, PR Stone and M Abumaree: Trophoblast deportation: just a waste disposal system or antigen sharing? J Reprod Immunol, 88(2), 99-105 (2011)

    102. LM Chen, B Liu, HB Zhao, P Stone, Q Chen and L Chamley: IL-6, TNFalpha and TGFbeta promote nonapoptotic trophoblast deportation and subsequently causes endothelial cell activation. Placenta, 31(1), 75-80 (2010)

    103. MS Esplin, K Merrell, R Goldenberg, Y Lai, JD Iams, B Mercer, CY Spong, M Miodovnik, HN Simhan, P van Dorsten and M Dombrowski: Proteomic identification of serum peptides predicting subsequent spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 204(5), 391 e1-8 (2011)

    104. C Gardiner, DS Tannetta, CA Simms, P Harrison, CW Redman and IL Sargent: Syncytiotrophoblast microvesicles released from pre-eclampsia placentae exhibit increased tissue factor activity. PLoS One, 6(10), e26313 (2011)

    105. TH Hung, JN Skepper and GJ Burton: In vitro ischemia-reperfusion injury in term human placenta as a model for oxidative stress in pathological pregnancies. Am J Pathol, 159(3), 1031-43 (2001)

    106. J Southcombe, D Tannetta, C Redman and I Sargent: The immunomodulatory role of syncytiotrophoblast microvesicles. PLoS One, 6(5), e20245 (2011)

    107. DD Taylor, W Zacharias and C Gercel-Taylor: Exosome isolation for proteomic analyses and RNA profiling. Methods Mol Biol, 728, 235-46 (2011)

    108. P Pantham, KJ Askelund and LW Chamley: Trophoblast deportation part II: a review of the maternal consequences of trophoblast deportation. Placenta, 32(10), 724-31 (2011)

    109. S Aschkenazi, S Straszewski, KM Verwer, H Foellmer, T Rutherford and G Mor: Differential regulation and function of the Fas/Fas ligand system in human trophoblast cells. Biol Reprod, 66(6), 1853-61 (2002)

    110. G Mor, LS Gutierrez, M Eliza, F Kahyaoglu and A Arici: Fas-fas ligand system-induced apoptosis in human placenta and gestational trophoblastic disease. Am J Reprod Immunol, 40(2), 89-94 (1998)

    111. BS Holder, CL Tower, K Forbes, MJ Mulla, JD Aplin and VM Abrahams: Immune cell activation by trophoblast-derived microvesicles is mediated by syncytin 1. Immunology, 136(2), 184-91 (2012)

    112. E Hergenreider, S Heydt, K Treguer, T Boettger, AJ Horrevoets, AM Zeiher, MP Scheffer, AS Frangakis, X Yin, M Mayr, T Braun, C Urbich, RA Boon and S Dimmeler: Atheroprotective communication between endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells through miRNAs. Nat Cell Biol, 14(3), 249-56 (2012)

    113. SS Chim, TK Shing, EC Hung, TY Leung, TK Lau, RW Chiu and YM Lo: Detection and characterization of placental microRNAs in maternal plasma. Clin Chem, 54(3), 482-90 (2008)

    114. M Eldh, K Ekstrom, H Valadi, M Sjostrand, B Olsson, M Jernas and J Lotvall: Exosomes communicate protective messages during oxidative stress; possible role of exosomal shuttle RNA. PLoS One, 5(12), e15353 (2010)

    115. SS Luo, O Ishibashi, G Ishikawa, T Ishikawa, A Katayama, T Mishima, T Takizawa, T Shigihara, T Goto, A Izumi, A Ohkuchi, S Matsubara and T Takeshita: Human villous trophoblasts express and secrete placenta-specific microRNAs into maternal circulation via exosomes. Biol Reprod, 81(4), 717-29 (2009)

    116. JM Moreno-Moya, F Vilella and C Simon: MicroRNA: key gene expression regulators. Fertil Steril, 101(6), 1516-23 (2014)

    117. JF Mouillet, RB Donker, T Mishima, T Cronqvist, T Chu and Y Sadovsky: The unique expression and function of miR-424 in human placental trophoblasts. Biol Reprod, 89(2), 25 (2013)

    118. RB Donker, JF Mouillet, T Chu, CA Hubel, DB Stolz, AE Morelli and Y Sadovsky: The expression profile of C19MC microRNAs in primary human trophoblast cells and exosomes. Mol Hum Reprod, 18(8), 417-24 (2012)

    119. E Shomer, S Katzenell, Y Zipori, RN Sammour, B Isermann, B Brenner and A Aharon: Microvesicles of women with gestational hypertension and preeclampsia affect human trophoblast fate and endothelial function. Hypertension, 62(5), 893-8 (2013)

    120. JM Roberts, LM Bodnar, KY Lain, CA Hubel, N Markovic, RB Ness and RW Powers: Uric acid is as important as proteinuria in identifying fetal risk in women with gestational hypertension. Hypertension, 46(6), 1263-9 (2005)

    121. AH Brandao, LM Pereira, AC Goncalves, ZS Reis, HV Leite and AC Cabral: Comparative study of endothelial function and uterine artery doppler velocimetry between pregnant women with or without preeclampsia development. J Pregnancy, 2012, 909315 (2012)

    122. K Matsubara, E Abe, H Ochi, Y Kusanagi and M Ito: Changes in serum concentrations of tumor necrosis factor alpha and adhesion molecules in normal pregnant women and those with pregnancy-induced hypertension. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 29(6), 422-6 (2003)

    123. M Gauster and B Huppertz: The paradox of caspase 8 in human villous trophoblast fusion. Placenta, 31(2), 82-8 (2010)

    124. G Tsimerman, A Roguin, A Bachar, E Melamed, B Brenner and A Aharon: Involvement of microparticles in diabetic vascular complications. Thromb Haemost, 106(2), 310-21 (2011)

    125. L Petrozella, M Mahendroo, B Timmons, S Roberts, D McIntire and JM Alexander: Endothelial microparticles and the antiangiogenic state in preeclampsia and the postpartum period. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 207(2), 140 e20-6 (2012)

    126. S Katzenell, E Shomer, Y Zipori, A Zylberfisz, B Brenner and A Aharon: Characterization of negatively charged phospholipids and cell origin of microparticles in women with gestational vascular complications. Thromb Res, 130(3), 479-84 (2012)

    127. E Biro, CA Lok, CE Hack, JA van der Post, MC Schaap, A Sturk and R Nieuwland: Cell-derived microparticles and complement activation in preeclampsia versus normal pregnancy. Placenta, 28(8-9), 928-35 (2007)

    128. M Tattersall, N Engineer, S Khanjani, SR Sooranna, VH Roberts, PL Grigsby, Z Liang, L Myatt and MR Johnson: Pro-labour myometrial gene expression: are preterm labour and term labour the same? Reproduction, 135(4), 569-79 (2008)

Share and Cite
Lindsey A. Burnett, Romana A. Nowak. Exosomes mediate embryo and maternal interactions at implantation and during pregnancy. Frontiers in Bioscience-Scholar. 2016. 8(1); 79-96.