Open Access
Review

Methylation alterations and advance of treatment in lymphoma

Meng-Ke Liu1,Xiao-Jian Sun1,Xiao-Dong Gao1,Ying Qian1,Li Wang1,*,Wei-Li Zhao1,*
1
Shanghai Institute of Hematology, State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, National Research Center for Translational Medicine at Shanghai, Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 200025 Shanghai, China
DOI: 10.52586/4970 Volume 26 Issue 9, pp.602-613
Submited: 22 June 2021 Revised: 19 July 2021
Accepted: 04 August 2021 Published: 30 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Epigenetics in development and cancer)
*Corresponding Author(s):  
Li Wang
E-mail:  
wl11194@rjh.com.cn
*Corresponding Author(s):  
Wei-Li Zhao
E-mail:  
zhao.weili@yahoo.com
Copyright: © 2021 The author(s). Published by BRI. This is an open access article under the CC BY 4.0 license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Abstract

Lymphoma is a common and aggressive form of hematopoietic malignancies with diverse clinical and pathological features due to its heterogeneity. Although the current immunochemotherapeutic regimens improve clinical outcomes, many patients still display poor prognosis and frequent relapse. Epigenetic alterations contribute to the progression of lymphoma. DNA methylation and histone methylation are the most common epigenetic alterations and regulate the gene expression involved in lymphoma pathogenesis, including silencing of tumor suppressor genes or activation of proto-oncogenes. Dysregulation or mutation of genes related to DNA methylation, including DNMTs, TET2, IDH2, and genes related to histone methylation, including EZH2, KMT2D has been observed. Most of these alterations are associated with inferior outcomes of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), and other subtypes of lymphoma. To overcome the pathogenetic consequence induced by aberrant DNA methylation and histone methylation, novel targeted drugs including azacitidine and decitabine have been gradually applied in practice to enhance the efficacy of current therapy and improve the prognosis of lymphoma patients. Investigating and targeting epigenetic mechanisms in lymphoma could be a key point of future research. Therefore, we mainly summarize the methylation alterations in lymphoma and their respective targeted therapies in this review.

Key words

Lymphoma; DNA methylation; Histone methylation; Targeted therapies

2. Introduction

Lymphoma is an aggressive and prevalent hematological malignancy which has diverse clinical characteristics and pathological features. According to the evolving knowledge in genetic alterations of lymphoma, classification and therapeutic strategies for lymphoma are also improved [1]. Lymphoma is pathologically classified into Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). NHL mainly includes B cell lymphomas such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), as well as T cell lymphomas such as peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (PTCL, NOS), anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) [2]. The standard therapy for B cell lymphoma, especially DLBCL, FL, is R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), which has remarkably improved the prognosis of patients [3, 4]. First-line therapy for T cell lymphoma is the CHOP regimen or CHOP-like regimen [4, 5]. Patients have different response to first-line treatment due to the heterogeneity of each subtype. Emerging targeted agents have also been explored in the treatment of lymphoma patients, in which epigenetic alterations are important targets [6].

Epigenetic changes refer to alterations of gene expression through mechanisms that do not involve changes in DNA sequence. These epigenetic mechanisms include DNA methylation, histone methylation, histone acetylation and chromatin remodeling [7]. Methylation alterations are the most common epigenetic modifications that regulate lymphoma genesis and progression, result in silencing of tumor suppressor genes and activation of proto-oncogenes. Of note, DNA methylation is mainly carried out by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) and tightly regulated by ten-eleven translocation dioxygenases (TETs) and isocitrate dehydrogenases (IDHs) [8]. Overexpression or mutation in DNMT3A, TET2 and IDH2 result in hypermethylation or hypomethylation in the promoter region of target genes and have functions in several physiological processes, including cell cycle, apoptosis, or immune response [9, 10]. Also, histone methylation plays a vital role in lymphoma progression [11]. The core genes involved in histone methylation include enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) and the lysine methyltransferase 2 family genes (KMT2s) [12]. Methylation of histone H3K4 is related to transcriptional activation, while methylation of H3K27 corresponds to gene silencing [9]. Importantly, these aberrant DNA methylation or histone methylation can be reversed by specific inhibitors. Targeted inhibitors of methylation alterations such as DNMTs inhibitors azacitidine and decitabine and EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat (EPZ6438) have been approved for clinical practices [13]. Thus, this review highlights the recent study of methylation alterations and possible therapeutic targets in lymphoma.

3. DNA methylation

DNA methylation is a crucial epigenetic alteration in normal cells and in the process of tumorigenesis. It can affect gene expression by directly controlling the activities of DNA regulatory elements, including the cytosine-guanine (CpG) islands of the promoter regions. In normal cells, DNA methylation at centromeric sequences and transposable elements can stabilize the genomic structure, but during malignant transformation, abnormal DNA methylation leads to silencing of many tumor suppressor genes. However, the upregulation of DNA methylation promotes the progression of multiple lymphomas and negatively influences clinical outcomes. Moreover, it has been proven that using DNA methylation inhibitor has a significant anti-tumor effect.

3.1 DNMTs

DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) are the predominant factors in the regulation of DNA methylation (Fig. 1). Within the DNMT family, DNMT1, DNMT3A and DNMT3B have been associated with tumorigenesis. DNMTs catalyzes 5-cytosine to generate 5-methylcytosine (5mC), which regulates gene silencing, imprinting, and genome stability [14]. The domain structures of DNMTs can be divided into the conserved catalytic domain on the C-terminus and diverse regulatory domains on the N-terminus. Different functions of DNMT1 and DNMT3A, DNMT3B are determined by the diversity of their N-terminal regions. The regulatory region of DNMT1 consists of several components such as a nuclear localization signal (NLS), a replication foci-targeting sequence (RFTS) for locating in the DNA replication fork, a CXXC domain for recognizing unmethylated CpG, as well as two bromo-adjacent homology (BAH) domains for protein-protein interaction and gene silencing, and a glycine-lysine (GK) domain as the linker of the C-terminal and N-terminal regions. The regulatory regions of DNMT3A and DNMT3B contain a proline-tryptophan-tryptophan-proline (PWWP) domain which is responsible for heterochromatin localization, and an ATRX-DNMT3A/3B-DNMT3L (ADD) domain which interacts with H3 when H3K4 is unmethylated [15, 16] (Fig. 2).

Figure 1: Summary of the methylation alterations in lymphoma cells.

Figure 2: Domain architectures of the DNA methyltransferases DNMT1, DNMT3A and DNMT3B.

3.1.1 DNMT1

Previous studies have revealed that DNMT1 participates in maintaining DNA methylation in the synthesized DNA strand, while DNMT3A and DNMT3B regulate de novo methylation [17]. Abnormal cytosine methylation in gene promoters results in gene silencing. DNMT mutations mainly occur in DNMT3A but is rarely reported in DNMT1 and DNMT3B. However, altered expression of DNMT1 has been implicated in lymphomagenesis.

DNMT1 overexpression was demonstrated to regulate cell cycle progression in DLBCL, with an increase of the proliferation marker Ki-67. It was observed that knocking down DNMT1 reduces several genes’ expression in regulating cell cycle, such as CDK1, CCNA2 and E2F2 [18]. Among these genes, CDK1 mediates the phosphorylation of DNMT1 and regulates its enzymatic activity [19]. During the S phase of the cell cycle, DNMT1 is recruited to methylate the hemimethylated DNA strand [18]. In MCL, DNMT1 expression is increased, and it can be downregulated by treatment with arsenic trioxide [20]. In Burkitt’s lymphoma, MYC translocation is also related to DNMTs dysregulation. MYC can bind directly to the promoter region of DNMT1 and upregulate DNMT1 expression, which results in lymphoma progression [21]. In T cell lymphoma, DNMT1 is also reported to be involved in the maintenance of MYC-induced T-lymphoma in mice, as knocking out DNMT1 reduces the tumor development [22].

3.1.2 DNMT3A

Although DNMT3A overexpression is not as common as DNMT1 and DNMT3B in lymphoma, it possesses the highest mutation rate [23]. DNMT3A mutation is detected in 11–20% of T cell lymphoma [24]. Loss-of-function DNMT3A mutations include mostly missense mutation on R882 or other residues, and less commonly nonsense or frameshift mutations which induce truncated protein [15, 25]. In PTCL and AITL, 20% of DNMT3A mutation occurs in the R882 position, other mutation positions such as D686, F731, G762 and G890 mainly locate in the methyltransferase domain of DNMT3A (Fig. 3) [24]. In PTCL, DNMT3A mutation is correlated with TET2 mutation, as 73% of patients with DNMT3A mutation have TET2 mutation [23, 24]. The coexistence of TET2 and DNMT3AR882 mutation results in hypomethylation and overexpression of Notch1 and Dtx1, which are involved in activating Notch signaling pathway [26, 27].

Labels in red represent mutations detected in T cell lymphoma, while labels in black represent mutations in acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes. The R882 mutation labeled in green is a mutational hotpot detected most frequently in lymphoma and other hematological malignancies.

Figure 3: The location of DNMT3A mutations in hematological malignancies. Labels in red represent mutations detected in T cell lymphoma, while labels in black represent mutations in acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes. The R882 mutation labeled in green is a mutational hotpot detected most frequently in lymphoma and other hematological malignancies.

3.1.3 DNMT3B

DNMT3B is overexpressed in patients with Burkitt’s lymphoma [28]. MYC is reported to directly bind to the promotor region of DNMT3B, resulting in DNMT3B overexpression in Burkitt’s lymphoma. Knocking down DNMT3B decreases the proliferation of tumor cell through blocking cell cycle and increasing lymphoma cell apoptosis [21]. In DLBCL, DNMT3B overexpression is significantly related with unfavorable overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) [29]. DNMT3B7, a splice variant of DNMT3B, is also elevated in DLBCL and MCL. DNMT3B7 causes hypomethylation of a proto-oncogene described as MEthylated in Normal Thymocytes (MENT), which increases MENT expression in lymphomagenesis [30].

3.1.4 DNMT Targeted therapy

DNMT inhibitors mainly include decitabine, azacitidine, guadecitabine, MG98, RG108, and SGI-1027. The clinical trials related to these DNMT inhibitors are listed in Table 1. Azacitidine is an analog of cytidine which can substitute the nucleoside in DNA and RNA and bind covalently to DNMTs to inhibit DNA methylation [31]. The overall response rate (ORR) is 6.7% when relapsed or refractory (R/R) DLBCL patients received combined therapy of azacitidine plus vorinostat (NCT01120834). Azacitidine plus R-ICE (NCT03450343) or azacitidine plus R-GDP (NCT03719989) are currently ongoing in DLBCL patients. A phase 1/2 trial of azacitidine combined with R-CHOP achieves 91.7% CR in DLBCL (NCT01004991). In T-cell lymphoma, clinical trials of oral azacitidine in AITL (NCT03593018), azacitidine plus CHOP in untreated PTCL (NCT03542266), azacitidine combined with voriostat in NK/T-cell lymphoma (NKTCL, NCT00336063) are ongoing. In the trial of Aza-SAHA-GBM [azacitidine, vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA), gemcitabine, busulfan, and melphalan] combined with stem cell transplantation for refractory lymphoma, the event-free-survival (EFS) was reported to be 65.4% in DLBCL, 100% in other B-cell lymphomas, 87.5% in T-cell NHL, and 76.2% in Hodgkin lymphoma (NCT01983969).

Decitabine is a deoxyribonucleoside that can incorporate into DNA and occupy DNMTs to induce DNA hypomethylation [32]. Several clinical trials using decitabine are currently ongoing. Decitabine improved the complete remission rate from 32% to 79% and prolonged the median PFS from 15.5 months to 35.0 months when combined with anti-PD-1 agent in Hodgkin lymphoma patients (NCT02961101) [33]. Furthermore, a phase 2 clinical trial investigated decitabine combined therapy with SHR-1210 in the treatment of R/R Hodgkin lymphoma (NCT03250962). In that study, the combined therapy achieved 95% ORR and 71% CR in R/R Hodgkin lymphoma patients who did not previously receive anti-PD-1 therapy. In patients had previously received anti-PD-1 therapy, the ORR is 52%, and CR rate is 28% [34]. A phase 4 clinical trial is exploring the efficacy of decitabine therapy in relapse and refractory DLBCL (NCT03579082). There is a phase 1 and 2 clinical trial estimating the efficacy of using decitabine plus R-CHOP therapy in newly diagnosed DLBCL (NCT02951728). Combined therapy of GVD (gemcitabine, vinorelbine, and doxorubicine) plus PD-1 antibody (SHR-1210) with or without decitabine on PMBCLs is being investigated in a trial (NCT03346642). Regarding T-cell lymphoma, there is a study on decitabine combined therapy which applies decitabine and pembrolizumab in PTCL and CTCL patients (NCT03240211). Also, studies of decitabine combined with CHOP in newly diagnosed PTCL (NCT03553537), decitabine combined with sintilimab in R/R NKTCL (NCT04279379) and decitabine combined with chidamide, or camrelizumab in NHL relapsed after chimeric antigen receptor T cells infusion (NCT04337606) are ongoing.

Table 1: Clinical trials of DNMT inhibitors.
Treatment Disease Trial name Phase Status NCT ID Results
Azacitidine + vorinostat Relapsed or refractory DLBCL Study of 5-azacitidine in Combination With Vorinostat in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Phase1 Phase2 completed NCT01120834 ORR 6.7%
Azacytidine + R-ICE Relapsed or refractory DLBCL Oral Azacitidine Plus Salvage Chemotherapy in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Phase1 recruiting NCT03450343 -
Azacytidine + R-GDP Relapsed or Refractory DLBCL Azacitidine and Rituximab-GDP Immunochemotherapy in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (EPIC) Phase2 Not yet recruiting NCT03719989 -
Azacitidine + R-CHOP DLBCL Phase I/II Trial of R-CHOP + Azacytidine in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Phase1 Phase2 completed NCT01004991 CR 91.7%
Azacitidine Relapsed or Refractory AITL Efficacy and Safety of Oral Azacitidine Compared to Investigator’s Choice Therapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory AITL Phase3 recruiting NCT03593018 -
Azacitidine + CHOP Untreated PTCL CC486-CHOP in Patients With Previously Untreated Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma Phase2 recruiting NCT03542266 -
Azacitidine + vorinostat NK/T-cell lymphoma Vorinostat and Azacitidine in Treating Patients With Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Cancer or Nasal Natural Killer T-Cell Lymphoma Phase1 Active, not recruiting NCT00336063 -
Stem cell transplant + Refractory lymphoma Aza-SAHA-GBM With AutoSCT for Refractory Lymphoma Phase1 Phase2 completed NCT01983969 Event-free-survival (EFS):
Azacitidine + Vorinostat + DLBCL 65.4%;
Gemcitabine + Busulfan + Hodgkin lymphoma 76.2%;
Melphalan T-cell NHL 87.5%;
Other B-cell lymphoma 100%
Decitabine + Anti-PD 1+chemotherapy Non-Hodgkin lymphoma Anti-PD-1 Antibody Alone or in Combination With Decitabine/Chemotherapy in Relapsed or Refractory Malignancies Phase1 Phase2 recruiting NCT02961101 -
Decitabine + SHR-1210 Hodgkin lymphoma SHR-1210 Alone or in Combination With Decitabine in Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma Phase2 recruiting NCT03250962 -
Decitabine DLBCL A Clinical Trial of Decitabine in Relapse and Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Phase4 recruiting NCT03579082 -
Decitabine + R-CHOP DLBCL Decitabine Plus R-CHOP in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DR-CHOP) Phase1 Phase2 Active, not recruiting NCT02951728 -
GVD and SHR-1210 with or without Decitabine PMBCL Two Stage Study of Combination of Chemotherapy, SHR-1210 and/or Decitabine for Relapsed/Refractory PMBCLs Phase1 Phase2 recruiting NCT03346642 -
Decitabine + Pembrolizumab PTCL, CTCL Study of Pembrolizumab Combined With Decitabine and Pralatrexate in PTCL and CTCL Phase1 recruiting NCT03240211 -
Decitabine + CHOP PTCL Efficacy and Safety of Decitabine Plus CHOP vs CHOP in Patients With Untreated Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma Phase3 recruiting NCT03553537 -
Decitabine + Sintilimab NK/T-cell lymphoma Sintilimab and Decitabine for Patients With Relapsed/Refractory or Advanced NK/T-cell Lymphoma Phase2 Not yet recruiting NCT04279379 -
Decitabine + Chidamide + Camrelizumab Non-Hodgkin lymphoma Chidamide in Combination With Decitabine in Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Relapsed After Chimeric Antigen Receptor Phase1 Phase2 recruiting NCT04337606 -

3.2 TET

The ten-eleven translocation (TET) family enzymes regulate DNA demethylation (Fig. 1) [8]. Mutations in the TET family genes are found to be involved in DNA hypermethylation in both DLBCL and PTCL [35]. The TET family enzymes include TET1, TET2, and TET3, in which TET2 is important in the DNA methylation alterations in lymphoma [36].

TET proteins are highly conserved on the C-terminal region and varied on the N-terminal region. There is a CXXC domain on the C-terminal region responsible for recognizing CpG sites, although this domain is absent from TET2. Their N-terminal regions, which are responsible for the catalytic function, consist of a double-stranded β-helix (DSBH) fold for binding α-KG/Fe(II)-dependent dioxygenases, and a cysteine-rich (Cys-rich) domain connected with the DSBH by two zinc fingers (Fig. 4A) [36, 37]. TETs function as dioxygenases in several steps of DNA demethylation to convert 5-methylcytosine (5mC) to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), oxidize 5hmC to 5-formylcytosine (5fC), and in the following step convert 5fC to 5-carboxylcytosine (5caC) (Fig. 4B) [38].

. (A) Domain architectures of the TET family proteins. (B) The pathway of DNA methylation and demethylation. Besides DNMTs and TETs, another enzyme TDG (thymine DNA glycosylase) is also involved in regulating these processes through BER (base excision repair).

Figure 4: The structure and function of TET family proteins. (A) Domain architectures of the TET family proteins. (B) The pathway of DNA methylation and demethylation. Besides DNMTs and TETs, another enzyme TDG (thymine DNA glycosylase) is also involved in regulating these processes through BER (base excision repair).

TET1 is involved in B cell lymphomagenesis as a tumor suppressor gene. It is reported that TET1 is hypermethylated and silenced in DLBCL and FL in mice [39]. In mouse models, deficiency of TET1 drives the formation of B cell lymphoma, while TET1 deficiency in human hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) leads to the differentiation towards B cell lineage and might induce secondary mutations or overexpression of BCL2 which attenuates apoptosis [39]. Several gene mutations related to histone modification, such as KMT2D mutations, are frequently found in TET1-knockout lymphoma mouse models [40].

TET2 is a well-known tumor suppressor. TET2 deficiency promotes B cell lymphomagenesis via impairing B cell differentiation in the germinal center (GC) and inducing GC hyperplasia [41]. Mutations in the C-terminal and N-terminal regions of TET2 catalytic domain lead to the disruption of the catalytic function, and most are heterozygous mutations [42]. Loss-of-function mutation of TET2 is displayed in about 10% of DLBCL, 50–80% of AITL, and 40–50% of PTCL [38]. TET2 mutations include deletion, missense, nonsense, and frameshift mutations. TET2 modulates the demethylation in DLBCL and AITL, and the mutations are predominantly observed in germinal center B-cell (GCB) DLBCL [43]. In GCB cells, TET2 mutations restrain gene expression in the GC exit and plasma cell differentiation [44]. Deficiency of TET2 promoted B cell tumor generation in mice models through activation-induced deaminase (AID)-mediated mutation in the B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling pathway [45]. TET2 mutations are primarily detected in T cell lymphoma derived from follicular helper T cells (TFH) including AITL and PTCL, in which TFH function as B-cell stimulator and promote B cells expansion [46]. TET2 mutation causes the altered methylation of BCL6 locus and increases the expression of BCL6, which promotes proliferation of TFH cells [47]. In AITL and PTCL, TET2 and DNMT3A mutations coexist, but whether these TET2/DNMT3A mutations cause hypermethylation or hypomethylation remains controversial in different reports [48]. TET2 mutations are related to the clinical features and prognosis in patients with AITL and PTCL-NOS. In a previous study, patients with TET2 mutations possessed advanced stage, more involved extranodal sites, higher possibility of B symptoms, and higher international prognosis index (IPI) than those with wild-type TET2 [49]. AITL patients with TET2 mutation are reported with decreased overall survival rate [50]. However, AITL patients with TET2 mutation reached an ORR of 75% upon azacitidine treatment [51].

3.3 IDH

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) can irreversibly convert isocitrate into α-ketoglutarate (α-KG) via oxidative decarboxylation in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle (Fig. 1). The human IDH family include cytoplasmic IDH1 and mitochondrial IDH2 and IDH3 [52]. IDH1 is mutated in only 0.8% of NHL [53]. Mutations of IDH2 that affect the enzyme’s catalytic function are detected in hematologic malignancies, including lymphoma. Mutant IDH2R172 convert 2-oxoglutarate to the oncometabolite d-2-hydroxyglutarate (d-2-HG) (Fig. 1). d-2-HG interacts with 2-oxoglutarate–dependent enzymes, including TETs and Jumonji domain-containing histone demethylases, to alter the DNA and histone methylation and affect lymphomagenesis [54, 55]. Of note, the IDH2R172 mutation is the particular type of mutation in AITL that can cause the elevation of 2-HG concentration. In contrast, IDH2R140 and IDH1R132 mutations that produce less 2-HG are observed in AML but not in AITL [56]. In AITL cases, IDH2/TET2 double-mutation is enriched in TFH-like phenotype. IDH2 mutations induce DNA hypermethylation of the promoter regions; the product 2-HG might inhibit TET2 enzyme and consequently lead to epigenetic dysregulation [57]. IDH2 mutations also influence the histone lysine methylation. As observed, there is an increase of the trimethylation of histone 3 lysine 27 (H3K27me3) level in AITL cases caused by the IDH2R172 mutation, as its product, d-2-HG, is proved to be an inhibitor of histone demethylase [57]. In our previous study, IDH2 mutation is found in 4.8% (3 of 62) of PTCL patients, including AITL, PTCL-NOS and anaplastic lymphoma kinase negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALK-ALCL) patients. Patients with IDH2 mutation display poor response to the CEOP (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, vincristine, prednisone)/IVE (ifosfamide, epirubicin, etoposide)/GDP (gemcitabine, cisplatin, dexamethasone) regimens, with ORR of 0%. Furthermore, IDH2 mutation also indicates poor outcome, with lower PFS and OS than patients without IDH2 mutations [58].

Enasidenib (AG-221), a drug inhibitor of mutant IDH2, is approved in AML [59, 60]. The study of enasidenib in the therapy of AITL is still under clinical investigation. A phase1 and phase2 study on enasidenib in AITL patients with IDH2 mutation has been completed, but the results are not yet published (NCT02273739).

4. Histone methylation

Histone methylation alteration is also detected in lymphoma through mutations of histone methyltransferases, which include Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 (EZH2) and mixed-lineage leukemia family proteins (MLLs; also known as lysine methyltransferase 2, KMT2s). EZH2 results in H3K27me3, which is related to the suppression of gene transcription. MLL alters the chromatin state through not only its direct trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4me3) but also recruitment of demethylases to reduce H3K27me3 (Fig. 1). Therefore, the functions of EZH2 and MLL are opposite. A balance between the states of H3K27me3 and H3K4me3, and the transforming of these states is associated with gene repression and activation [61].

4.1 EZH2

EZH2 is the catalytic component of the polycomb repression complex 2 (PRC2), mediating H3K27me3 and recruiting the DNA methyltransferase to inhibit gene transcription (Fig. 1) [62]. EZH2 acts on cell proliferation and differentiation in tumorigenesis. During the development of B-lymphocyte, EZH2 downregulates genes which have negative effect on cell cycle to promote proliferation of immature B cells [63]. EZH2 represses anti-proliferative gene CDKN1A and inhibits IRF4 and PRDM1 expression in the terminal differentiation [64, 65].

EZH2 overexpression is more common in aggressive B-cell lymphoma than in indolent B-cell lymphoma [66]. In a study of various types of B-cell lymphoma, EZH2 was positive in 97% of cases of lymphoma, including DLBCL, Burkitt lymphoma, and double-hit lymphoma. This study also reveals that EZH2 expression is positively correlated with phosphorylated ERK1/2 (p-ERK1/2) in DLBCL and MYC expression in Burkitt lymphoma and double-hit lymphoma [66]. Coexpression of EZH2 and BCL-2 was related to worse OS and PFS and a higher frequency of relapse in DLBCL [67]. In a study of primary gastrointestinal DLBCL, EZH2 overexpression is indicated with a more progressive clinical stage and inferior outcomes [68]. EZH2 gain-of-function mutation is mainly detected in GCB-DLBCL and follicular lymphoma (FL), including predominantly heterozygous mutation on tyrosine 641 (Y641) [63]. Somatic mutation of EZH2 in Y641 enhances H3K27me3 [69]. EZH2Y641 is detected in 15% of GCB-DLBCL but none of ABC DLBCLs [70]. It is observed in the mouse model that mutant EZH2 promotes the formation of lymphoma [71]. Besides Y641 mutation, EZH2 A677 mutation is also reported in human B cell lymphoma and has a similar function as Y641 mutation in increasing the trimethylation of H3K27 [72]. It is found that EZH2 Y646 mutation in FL correlates with genes related to cell proliferation, such as an increase of MYC target gene expression [73].

EZH2 is also found overexpressed in T-NHL and can be targeted by EZH2 inhibitors [74]. In some studies, EZH2 upregulation is mediated by high MYC protein expression. In PTCL, EZH2 is overexpressed in 64.6% (53/82) patients, which is related to advanced clinical stage and lower OS [75]. In NKTCL, EZH2 is overexpressed in most of the patients, which is related to poor prognosis [76]. EZH2 expression can be downregulated by JAK inhibitor, which indicates that EZH2 could be downstream of the JAK/STAT pathway.

Several small-molecule inhibitors of EZH2 have been discovered, and the effects of these EZH2 inhibitors such as tazemetostat (EPZ6438), GSK343, GSK503, GSK126, CPI-1205 are evaluated in some experimental studies and clinical trials [77]. Tazemetostat (EPZ6438) selectively inhibits EZH2 function and decreases H3K27 methylation in B lymphoma cell lines and Y646 mutated cells. Oral administration of EPZ6438 also shows EZH2 inhibition in the mice model [78]. There are multiple clinical trials to investigate the efficacy of tazemetostat in lymphoma. A study (NCT01897571) explores the effect of tazemetostat combined with prednisolone in DLBCL or tazemetostat alone in FL. During the assessment, eight DLBCL or FL patients’ median time of partial response was 3.5 months; three patients with initial partial response achieved complete response at 9, 22, 24 months [79]. In the phase 2 trial (NCT01897571), tazemetostat monotherapy achieved the objective response rate of 69% at EZH2 mutated FL patients; the median PFS was 13.8 months [80].

GSK126 is an EZH2 inhibitor that can inhibit the activity of both wild-type and mutant EZH2 in several DLBCL and FL cell lines. GSK126 treatment leads to decreased H3K27me3 level and tumor regression [81]. It is also observed that GSK126 can reduce H3K27me3 in multi-drug resistant B lymphoma cell lines and increase the sensitivity to etoposide in the combined therapy [82]. A phase 1 clinical trial (NCT02082977) has explored the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and clinical efficacy in R/R DLBCL, transformed FL, and other NHL with GSK126. At the end of the trial, 1 of the 20 (5%) lymphoma patients achieved partial response, while 6 patients had stable disease (30%) [83].

4.2 KMT2

The lysine methyltransferase 2 (KMT2; also known as MLL) family proteins methylate histone H3K4 and positively regulate gene transcription (Fig. 1). They include KMT2A, KMT2B, KMT2C, KMT2D, KMT2F, and KMT2G; each protein is involved in multiple subunit protein complexes with diverse components [84]. However, only KMT2A, KMT2C, and KMT2D are reported to be mutated in hematological malignancies. KMT2A and KMT2D induce H3K4me3 in the promoter region of the genes involved in hematopoietic cell development and differentiation. KMT2C induces H3K4me1 in the enhancer regions to regulate gene expression [85].

In the KMT2 family, KMT2D and KMT2C are found to be involved in malignant lymphomas such as DLBCL and FL [84]. KMT2D is supposed to be a tumor suppressor gene, as 91% of mutations result in silencing the enzymatic function [86]. KMT2D mutations are detected in 24–32% of DLBCL and 72–89% of FL patients, mostly are nonsense or frameshift mutations resulting in down-regulating the expression of KMT2D protein [87]. However, KMT2C mutations are detected in 8.2% of DLBCL [88] and 13% of FL patients [87]. KMT2D and KMT2C mutations are considered to loss their functions of histone methylations. KMT2D deficiency results in alteration of several genes, including TNFAIP3, SOCS3, SGK1, TRAF3, TNFRSF14 and ARID1A, and subsequently influences the JAK-STAT, Toll-like receptor and B-cell receptor pathways in B-lymphoma cells [89]. In MCL, KMT2D mutations indicate dismal prognosis. The 4-year PFS and OS are lower in KMT2D mutated patients than wild-type patients (PFS 33.2% vs. 63.7%, OS 62.3% vs. 86.8%). MCL patients with KMT2D mutations have higher β2-microglobulin, higher frequency of B symptoms, and bulky disease [90]. KMT2D mutations are also detected in 18-23% of NKTCL patients and related to poor prognosis [91, 92].

As reported in previous studies, chidamide combined with decitabine could target KMT2D mutation and inactivate the constitutively activated MAPK pathway in T-cell lymphoma [11].

5. RNA methylation

RNA methylation is a cotranscriptional or posttranscriptional modification which has become an emerging regulatory mechanism of gene expression, termed as “epitranscriptomics”, commonly occurs in N6-methyladenosine (m6A), 5-methylcytosine (m5C), 7-methylguanosine (m7G), m1G, m2G, m6G, and N1-methyladenosine (m1A) [93]. The most prevalent RNA modification is m6A methylation and demethylation. M6A modification is carried out by “writers” such as methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3), METTL14, Wilms tumor 1-associated protein (WTAP), RNA-binding motif protein 15/15B (RBM15/15B), and KIAA1429; “readers” such as YT521-B homologue (YTH) protein family, insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding proteins (IGF2BP1/2/3) and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) family; and “erasers” such as fat mass and obesity-associated protein (FTO) and alkB homologue 5 (ALKBH5) [94].

Methyltransferase METTL3 expression and m6A methylation are upregulated in DLBCL tissues and cell lines, leading to the increase of pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) mRNA expression and transcription, which is the upstream of Wnt signaling and promote the progression of DLBCL [95]. Another m6A methyltransferase WTAP is also overexpressed in DLBCL. It was reported that WTAP stabilizes its own mRNA and forms complex with BCL6 and Hsp90 to promote cell proliferation [96]. Recent study reveals that WTAP targets HK2 gene through enhancing HK2 m6A, and is regulated by PIWI-interacting RNA (piRNA)-30473. Increased expression of piRNA-30473/WTAP/HK2 axis indicates with inferior prognosis in DLBCL [97]. Overexpression of WTAP in NKTCL cell lines also contributes to cell proliferation and drug resistance [98].

RNA demethylase ALKBH5 and RNA binding protein YTHDF3, activated by MYC, reduce the m6A levels in the mRNA of the selected MYC-repressed genes, SPI1 and PHF12, and consequently promote B lymphoma cells proliferation [99]. Deletions and mutations of YTHDF2 are found in 8% of PTCL, which may suggest the deregulation of mRNA stability in PTCL [100]. M6A reader IGF2BP3 is upregulated in mantle cell lymphoma cell lines and associated with Ki-67 which reflects increased cell proliferation [101].

RNA m1A demethylase ALKBH3 hypermethylation is frequently observed in 44% of Hodgkin lymphoma, 38% of Burkitt’s lymphoma and 37% of other non-Hodgkin lymphoma cell lines, resulting in the downregulation of ALKBH3 mRNA. Methylated ALKBH3 is related with poor prognosis in Hodgkin lymphoma patients. However, hypermethylation of ALKBH3 can be recovered by azacytidine [102].

DNMT2 is an important RNA methyltransferase involved in tRNA m5C modification. Unlike other DNMTs family proteins, DNMT2 has conserved catalytic structures but low DNA methyltransferase activity [103]. DNMT2 binding with RNA-binding protein hnRNPK leads to the formation of azacitidine-sensitive chromatin structure in leukemia cell lines [104], indicating DNMT2 cooperating with azacitidine to inhibit tRNA m5C modification.

6. Conclusion and perspectives

Improved understanding of epigenetic and epitranscriptomic alterations in lymphoma has raised new insights into lymphoma pathogenesis and progression. DNA and histone methylation are highly variable processes in which the DNA methylation functions mainly by silencing tumor suppressor genes, while the histone methylations on H3K4 and H3K27 play opposite roles in gene transcriptional regulation. RNA methylation is also a novel mechanism involved in regulating RNA metabolism. Overexpression or mutation of the enzymes such as DNMT3A, TET2, EZH2, and KMT2D are frequently detected in lymphoma. Survival data also supported that most of these epigenetic alterations are associated with poor clinical outcomes in lymphoma patients. Current studies have shown that aberrant epigenetic modification could be targeted by multiple agents such as DNMT inhibitors azacitidine and decitabine, and EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat. Most of the inhibitors are under investigation through clinical trials. However, the clinical efficacy of these epigenetic drugs and whether they could significantly improve lymphoma patient prognosis have yet to be verified. New target agents for epigenetic alterations are still worth investigating.

7. Author contributions

WLZ and LW developed the original idea of the article; MKL, XJS, XDG and YQ collected literature and data; and WLZ and LW wrote the paper. All authors approved the final manuscript.

8. Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

9. Acknowledgment

We thank Peter Liao for English editing.

10. Funding

This study was supported, in part, by research funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81830007, 81520108003, 81670176, and 82070204), Chang Jiang Scholars Program, Shanghai Municipal Education Commission Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Grant Support (20152206, and 20152208), Clinical Research Plan of Shanghai Hospital Development Center (SHDC2020CR1032B), Multicenter Clinical Research Project by Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (DLY201601), Collaborative Innovation Center of Systems Biomedicine, and the Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation.

11. Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References
  • [1] Dalla-Favera R. Lymphoid malignancies: many tumor types, many altered genes, many therapeutic challenges. Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2012; 122: 3396–3397.
  • [2] Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Pileri SA, Harris NL, Stein H, Siebert R, et al. The 2016 revision of the World Health Organization classification of lymphoid neoplasms. Blood. 2016; 127: 2375–2390.
  • [3] Coiffier B, Thieblemont C, Van Den Neste E, Lepeu G, Plantier I, Castaigne S, et al. Long-term outcome of patients in the LNH-98.5 trial, the first randomized study comparing rituximab-CHOP to standard CHOP chemotherapy in DLBCL patients: a study by the Groupe d’Etudes des Lymphomes de l’Adulte. Blood. 2010; 116: 2040–2045.
  • [4] Armitage JO, Gascoyne RD, Lunning MA, Cavalli F. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The Lancet. 2017; 390: 298–310.
  • [5] Armitage JO. The aggressive peripheral T-cell lymphomas: 2017. American Journal of Hematology. 2017; 92: 706–715.
  • [6] Wang L, Qin W, Huo Y, Li X, Shi Q, Rasko JEJ, et al. Advances in targeted therapy for malignant lymphoma. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2020; 5: 15.
  • [7] Taylor KH, Briley A, Wang Z, Cheng J, Shi H, Caldwell CW. Aberrant epigenetic gene regulation in lymphoid malignancies. Seminars in Hematology. 2013; 50: 38–47.
  • [8] Sun XJ, Chen Z, Chen SJ. Mutations in DNA Methyltransferases and Demethylases. In: Boffetta P., Hainaut P. (eds) Encyclopedia of Cancer (pp. 528–537). 3rd edn. Oxford: Academic Press. 2018.
  • [9] Roy DM, Walsh LA, Chan TA. Driver mutations of cancer epigenomes. Protein & Cell. 2014; 5: 265–296.
  • [10] Blecua P, Martinez-Verbo L, Esteller M. The DNA methylation landscape of hematological malignancies: an update. Molecular Oncology. 2020; 14: 1616–1639.
  • [11] Ji M, Huang Y, Huang J, Wang Z, Fu D, Liu H, et al. Histone modifier gene mutations in peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified. Haematologica. 2018; 103: 679–687.
  • [12] Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Roh T, Schones DE, Wang Z, et al. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell. 2007; 129: 823–837.
  • [13] Sermer D, Pasqualucci L, Wendel HG, Melnick A, Younes A. Emerging epigenetic-modulating therapies in lymphoma. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology. 2019; 16: 494–507.
  • [14] Duy C, Béguelin W, Melnick A. Epigenetic Mechanisms in Leukemias and Lymphomas. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine. 2020; 10: a034959.
  • [15] Hamidi T, Singh AK, Chen T. Genetic alterations of DNA methylation machinery in human diseases. Epigenomics. 2015; 7: 247–265.
  • [16] Wong KK, Lawrie CH, Green TM. Oncogenic Roles and Inhibitors of DNMT1, DNMT3a, and DNMT3B in Acute Myeloid Leukaemia. Biomarker Insights. 2019; 14: 1177271919846454.
  • [17] Subramaniam D, Thombre R, Dhar A, Anant S. DNA methyltransferases: a novel target for prevention and therapy. Frontiers in Oncology. 2014; 4: 80.
  • [18] Loo SK, Ab Hamid SS, Musa M, Wong KK. DNMT1 is associated with cell cycle and DNA replication gene sets in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Pathology, Research and Practice. 2018; 214: 134–143.
  • [19] Lavoie G, St-Pierre Y. Phosphorylation of human DNMT1: implication of cyclin-dependent kinases. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2011; 409: 187–192.
  • [20] Li XY, Li Y, Zhang L, Liu X, Feng L, Wang X. The antitumor effects of arsenic trioxide in mantle cell lymphoma via targeting Wnt/betacatenin pathway and DNA methyltransferase-1. Oncology Reports. 2017; 38: 3114–3120.
  • [21] Poole CJ, Zheng W, Lodh A, Yevtodiyenko A, Liefwalker D, Li H, et al. DNMT3B overexpression contributes to aberrant DNA methylation and MYC-driven tumor maintenance in T-all and Burkitt’s lymphoma. Oncotarget. 2017; 8: 76898–76920.
  • [22] Peters SL, Hlady RA, Opavska J, Klinkebiel D, Novakova S, Smith LM, et al. Essential role for Dnmt1 in the prevention and maintenance of MYC-induced T-cell lymphomas. Molecular and Cellular Biology. 2013; 33: 4321–4333.
  • [23] Yang L, Rau R, Goodell MA. DNMT3a in haematological malignancies. Nature Reviews. Cancer. 2015; 15: 152–165.
  • [24] Couronne L, Bastard C, Bernard OA. TET2 and DNMT3A mutations in human T-cell lymphoma. New England Journal of Medicine. 2012; 366: 95–96.
  • [25] Hou HA, Kuo YY, Liu CY, Chou WC, Lee MC, Chen CY, et al. DNMT3A mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: stability during disease evolution and clinical implications. Blood. 2012; 119: 559–568.
  • [26] Scourzic L, Couronné L, Pedersen MT, Della Valle V, Diop M, Mylonas E, et al. DNMT3a(R882H) mutant and Tet2 inactivation cooperate in the deregulation of DNA methylation control to induce lymphoid malignancies in mice. Leukemia. 2016; 30: 1388–1398.
  • [27] Fukumoto K, Nguyen TB, Chiba S, Sakata-Yanagimoto M. Review of the biologic and clinical significance of genetic mutations in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma. Cancer Science. 2018; 109: 490–496.
  • [28] Robaina MC, Mazzoccoli L, Arruda VO, Reis FRDS, Apa AG, de Rezende LMM, et al. Deregulation of DNMT1, DNMT3B and miR-29s in Burkitt lymphoma suggests novel contribution for disease pathogenesis. Experimental and Molecular Pathology. 2015; 98: 200–207.
  • [29] Amara K, Ziadi S, Hachana M, Soltani N, Korbi S, Trimeche M. DNA methyltransferase DNMT3b protein overexpression as a prognostic factor in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Cancer Science. 2010; 101: 1722–1730.
  • [30] Alkebsi L, Handa H, Sasaki Y, Osaki Y, Yanagisawa K, Ogawa Y, et al. DNMT3B7 expression related to MENT expression and its promoter methylation in human lymphomas. Leukemia Research. 2013; 37: 1662–1667.
  • [31] Cogle CR, Scott BL, Boyd T, Garcia-Manero G. Oral Azacitidine (CC-486) for the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Acute Myeloid Leukemia. The Oncologist. 2015; 20: 1404–1412.
  • [32] Hollenbach PW, Nguyen AN, Brady H, Williams M, Ning Y, Richard N, et al. A comparison of azacitidine and decitabine activities in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines. PLoS ONE. 2010; 5: e9001.
  • [33] Liu Y, Wang C, Li X, Dong L, Yang Q, Chen M, et al. Improved clinical outcome in a randomized phase II study of anti-PD-1 camrelizumab plus decitabine in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer. 2021; 9: e002347.
  • [34] Nie J, Wang C, Liu Y, Yang Q, Mei Q, Dong L, et al. Addition of Low-Dose Decitabine to Anti–PD-1 Antibody Camrelizumab in Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2019; 37: 1479–1489.
  • [35] Lio CJ, Yuita H, Rao A. Dysregulation of the TET family of epigenetic regulators in lymphoid and myeloid malignancies. Blood. 2019; 134: 1487–1497.
  • [36] Ko M, An J, Pastor WA, Koralov SB, Rajewsky K, Rao A. TET proteins and 5-methylcytosine oxidation in hematological cancers. Immunological Reviews. 2015; 263: 6–21.
  • [37] Yin X, Xu Y. Structure and Function of TET Enzymes. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 2016; 945: 275–302.
  • [38] Nakajima H, Kunimoto H. TET2 as an epigenetic master regulator for normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Cancer Science. 2014; 105: 1093–1099.
  • [39] Rasmussen KD, Helin K. TET1: an epigenetic guardian of lymphomagenesis. Nature Immunology. 2015; 16: 592–594.
  • [40] Cimmino L, Dawlaty MM, Ndiaye-Lobry D, Yap YS, Bakogianni S, Yu Y, et al. TET1 is a tumor suppressor of hematopoietic malignancy. Nature Immunology. 2015; 16: 653–662.
  • [41] Dominguez PM, Ghamlouch H, Rosikiewicz W, Kumar P, Beguelin W, Fontan L, et al. TET2 Deficiency Causes Germinal Center Hyperplasia, Impairs Plasma Cell Differentiation, and Promotes B-cell Lymphomagenesis. Cancer Discovery. 2018; 8: 1632–1653.
  • [42] Chiba S. Dysregulation of TET2 in hematologic malignancies. International Journal of Hematology. 2017; 105: 17–22.
  • [43] Kubuki Y, Yamaji T, Hidaka T, Kameda T, Shide K, Sekine M, et al. TET2 mutation in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hematopathology. 2017; 56: 145–149.
  • [44] Shingleton JR, Dave SS. TET2 Deficiency Sets the Stage for B-cell Lymphoma. Cancer Discovery. 2018; 8: 1515–1517.
  • [45] Mouly E, Ghamlouch H, Della-Valle V, Scourzic L, Quivoron C, Roos-Weil D, et al. B-cell tumor development in Tet2-deficient mice. Blood Advances. 2018; 2: 703–714.
  • [46] Schwartz FH, Cai Q, Fellmann E, Hartmann S, Mäyränpää MI, Karjalainen-Lindsberg M, et al. TET2 mutations in B cells of patients affected by angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma. Journal of Pathology. 2017; 242: 129–133.
  • [47] Nishizawa S, Sakata-Yanagimoto M, Hattori K, Muto H, Nguyen T, Izutsu K, et al. BCL6 locus is hypermethylated in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma. International Journal of Hematology. 2017; 105: 465–469.
  • [48] Sakata-Yanagimoto M. Multistep tumorigenesis in peripheral T cell lymphoma. International Journal of Hematology. 2015; 102: 523–527.
  • [49] Lemonnier F, Couronné L, Parrens M, Jaïs J, Travert M, Lamant L, et al. Recurrent TET2 mutations in peripheral T-cell lymphomas correlate with TFH-like features and adverse clinical parameters. Blood. 2012; 120: 1466–1469.
  • [50] Guo YM, Liu XF, Jiao LJ, Yin SY, Wang Z, Li XX, et al. Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma: histopathological grading and prognosis. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2019; 48: 784–790. (In Chinese)
  • [51] Lemonnier F, Dupuis J, Sujobert P, Tournillhac O, Cheminant M, Sarkozy C, et al. Treatment with 5-azacytidine induces a sustained response in patients with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2019; 132: 2305–2309.
  • [52] Lee S, Urman A, Desai P. Emerging drug profile: Krebs cycle and cancer: IDH mutations and therapeutic implications. Leukemia & Lymphoma. 2019; 60: 2635–2645.
  • [53] Zou Y, Zeng Y, Zhang D, Zou S, Cheng Y, Yao Y. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are frequent in Chinese patients with acute myeloid leukemia but rare in other types of hematological disorders. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2010; 402: 378–383.
  • [54] Cairns RA, Iqbal J, Lemonnier F, Kucuk C, de Leval L, Jais J, et al. IDH2 mutations are frequent in angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2012; 119: 1901–1903.
  • [55] Figueroa ME, Abdel-Wahab O, Lu C, Ward PS, Patel J, Shih A, et al. Leukemic IDH1 and IDH2 mutations result in a hypermethylation phenotype, disrupt TET2 function, and impair hematopoietic differentiation. Cancer Cell. 2010; 18: 553–567.
  • [56] Lemonnier F, Cairns RA, Inoue S, Li WY, Dupuy A, Broutin S, et al. The IDH2 R172K mutation associated with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma produces 2HG in T cells and impacts lymphoid development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016; 113: 15084–15089.
  • [57] Wang C, McKeithan TW, Gong Q, Zhang W, Bouska A, Rosenwald A, et al. IDH2R172 mutations define a unique subgroup of patients with angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma. Blood. 2015; 126: 1741–1752.
  • [58] Cai M, Cheng S, Xin W, Hu J, Song Y, Yan Z, et al. CEOP/IVE/GDP Alternating Regimen Compared with CEOP as the first-Line Therapy for Newly Diagnosed Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Results from a Phase 2, Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. Blood. 2020; 12: 41.
  • [59] Yen K, Travins J, Wang F, David MD, Artin E, Straley K, et al. AG-221, a first-in-Class Therapy Targeting Acute Myeloid Leukemia Harboring Oncogenic IDH2 Mutations. Cancer Discovery. 2017; 7: 478–493.
  • [60] Sun X, Chen S, Chen Z. Treating leukemia: differentiation therapy for mIDH2 AML. Cell Research. 2019; 29: 427–428.
  • [61] Lue JK, Amengual JE. Emerging EZH2 Inhibitors and their Application in Lymphoma. Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports. 2018; 13: 369–382.
  • [62] Berg T, Thoene S, Yap D, Wee T, Schoeler N, Rosten P, et al. A transgenic mouse model demonstrating the oncogenic role of mutations in the polycomb-group gene EZH2 in lymphomagenesis. Blood. 2014; 123: 3914–3924.
  • [63] Li B, Chng WJ. EZH2 abnormalities in lymphoid malignancies: underlying mechanisms and therapeutic implications. Journal of Hematology & Oncology. 2019; 12: 118.
  • [64] Béguelin W, Popovic R, Teater M, Jiang Y, Bunting KL, Rosen M, et al. EZH2 is required for germinal center formation and somatic EZH2 mutations promote lymphoid transformation. Cancer Cell. 2013; 23: 677–692.
  • [65] Heyn H, Esteller M. EZH2: an epigenetic gatekeeper promoting lymphomagenesis. Cancer Cell. 2013; 23: 563–565.
  • [66] Tian X, Pelton A, Shahsafaei A, Dorfman DM. Differential expression of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) protein in small cell and aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas and differential regulation of EZH2 expression by p-ERK1/2 and MYC in aggressive B-cell lymphomas. Modern Pathology. 2016; 29: 1050–1057.
  • [67] Deng Y, Chen X, Huang C, Chen G, Chen F, Lu J, et al. EZH2/Bcl-2 Coexpression Predicts Worse Survival in Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphomas and Demonstrates Poor Efficacy to Rituximab in Localized Lesions. Journal of Cancer. 2019; 10: 2006–2017.
  • [68] Liu Y, Yu K, Li M, Zeng K, Wei J, Li X, et al. EZH2 overexpression in primary gastrointestinal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and its association with the clinicopathological features. Human Pathology. 2017; 64: 213–221.
  • [69] Morin RD, Johnson NA, Severson TM, Mungall AJ, An J, Goya R, et al. Somatic mutations altering EZH2 (Tyr641) in follicular and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas of germinal-center origin. Nature Genetics. 2010; 42: 181–185.
  • [70] Zhao Z, Chen L, Dawlaty MM, Pan F, Weeks O, Zhou Y, et al. Combined Loss of Tet1 and Tet2 Promotes B Cell, but not Myeloid Malignancies, in Mice. Cell Reports. 2015; 13: 1692–1704.
  • [71] Souroullas GP, Jeck WR, Parker JS, Simon JM, Liu J, Paulk J, et al. An oncogenic Ezh2 mutation induces tumors through global redistribution of histone 3 lysine 27 trimethylation. Nature Medicine. 2016; 22: 632–640.
  • [72] McCabe MT, Graves AP, Ganji G, Diaz E, Halsey WS, Jiang Y, et al. Mutation of a677 in histone methyltransferase EZH2 in human B-cell lymphoma promotes hypertrimethylation of histone H3 on lysine 27 (H3K27). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2012; 109: 2989–2994.
  • [73] Huet S, Xerri L, Tesson B, Mareschal S, Taix S, Mescam-Mancini L, et al. EZH2 alterations in follicular lymphoma: biological and clinical correlations. Blood Cancer Journal. 2017; 7: e555.
  • [74] Giulino-Roth L. EZH2: a potential new target in T-cell lymphoma? Leukemia & Lymphoma. 2015; 56: 1924–1925.
  • [75] Zhang H, Lv H, Jia X, Hu G, Kong L, Zhang T, et al. Clinical significance of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 and histone deacetylases 1 and 2 expression in peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Oncology Letters. 2019; 18: 1415–1423.
  • [76] Liu J, Liang L, Huang S, Nong L, Li D, Zhang B, et al. Aberrant differential expression of EZH2 and H3K27me3 in extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type, is associated with disease progression and prognosis. Human Pathology. 2019; 83: 166–176.
  • [77] Gulati N, Béguelin W, Giulino-Roth L. Enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) inhibitors. Leukemia & Lymphoma. 2018; 59: 1574–1585.
  • [78] Knutson SK, Kawano S, Minoshima Y, Warholic NM, Huang K, Xiao Y, et al. Selective inhibition of EZH2 by EPZ-6438 leads to potent antitumor activity in EZH2-mutant non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Molecular Cancer Therapeutics. 2014; 13: 842–854.
  • [79] Italiano A, Soria J, Toulmonde M, Michot J, Lucchesi C, Varga A, et al. Tazemetostat, an EZH2 inhibitor, in relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and advanced solid tumours: a first-in-human, open-label, phase 1 study. Lancet Oncology. 2018; 19: 649–659.
  • [80] Morschhauser F, Tilly H, Chaidos A, McKay P, Phillips T, Assouline S, et al. Tazemetostat for patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma: an open-label, single-arm, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncology. 2020; 21: 1433–1442.
  • [81] McCabe MT, Ott HM, Ganji G, Korenchuk S, Thompson C, Van Aller GS, et al. EZH2 inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for lymphoma with EZH2-activating mutations. Nature. 2012; 492: 108–112.
  • [82] Smonskey M, Lasorsa E, Rosario S, Kirk JS, Hernandez-Ilizaliturri FJ, Ellis L. EZH2 inhibition re-sensitizes multidrug resistant B-cell lymphomas to etoposide mediated apoptosis. Oncoscience. 2016; 3: 21–30.
  • [83] Yap TA, Winter JN, Giulino-Roth L, Longley J, Lopez J, Michot J, et al. Phase i Study of the Novel Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 (EZH2) Inhibitor GSK2816126 in Patients with Advanced Hematologic and Solid Tumors. Clinical Cancer Research. 2019; 25: 7331–7339.
  • [84] Rao RC, Dou Y. Hijacked in cancer: the KMT2 (MLL) family of methyltransferases. Nature Reviews. Cancer. 2015; 15: 334–346.
  • [85] Kwon M, Park K, Hyun K, Lee J, Zhou L, Cho Y, et al. H2B ubiquitylation enhances H3K4 methylation activities of human KMT2 family complexes. Nucleic Acids Research. 2020; 48: 5442–5456.
  • [86] Morin RD, Mendez-Lago M, Mungall AJ, Goya R, Mungall KL, Corbett RD, et al. Frequent mutation of histone-modifying genes in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Nature. 2011; 476: 298–303.
  • [87] Green MR. Chromatin modifying gene mutations in follicular lymphoma. Blood. 2018; 131: 595–604.
  • [88] Huang Y, Cai K, Xu P, Wang L, Huang C, Fang Y, et al. CREBBP/EP300 mutations promoted tumor progression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma through altering tumor-associated macrophage polarization via FBXW7-NOTCH-CCL2/CSF1 axis. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy. 2021; 6: 10.
  • [89] Ortega-Molina A, Boss IW, Canela A, Pan H, Jiang Y, Zhao C, et al. The histone lysine methyltransferase KMT2D sustains a gene expression program that represses B cell lymphoma development. Nature Medicine. 2015; 21: 1199–1208.
  • [90] Ferrero S, Rossi D, Rinaldi A, Bruscaggin A, Spina V, Eskelund CW, et al. KMT2D mutations and TP53 disruptions are poor prognostic biomarkers in mantle cell lymphoma receiving high-dose therapy: a FIL study. Haematologica. 2020; 105: 1604–1612.
  • [91] Lee S, Park HY, Kang SY, Kim SJ, Hwang J, Lee S, et al. Genetic alterations of JAK/STAT cascade and histone modification in extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma nasal type. Oncotarget. 2015; 6: 17764–17776.
  • [92] Li Q, Zhang W, Li J, Xiong J, Liu J, Chen T, et al. Plasma circulating tumor DNA assessment reveals KMT2D as a potential poor prognostic factor in extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma. Biomarker Research. 2020; 8: 27.
  • [93] Lan Q, Liu PY, Haase J, Bell JL, Hüttelmaier S, Liu T. The Critical Role of RNA m6a Methylation in Cancer. Cancer Research. 2019; 79: 1285–1292.
  • [94] Yao L, Yin H, Hong M, Wang Y, Yu T, Teng Y, et al. RNA methylation in hematological malignancies and its interactions with other epigenetic modifications. Leukemia. 2021; 35: 1243–1257.
  • [95] Cheng Y, Fu Y, Wang Y, Wang J. The m6A Methyltransferase METTL3 Is Functionally Implicated in DLBCL Development by Regulating m6A Modification in PEDF. Frontiers in Genetics. 2020; 11: 955.
  • [96] Kuai Y, Gong X, Ding L, Li F, Lei L, Gong Y, et al. Wilms’ tumor 1-associating protein plays an aggressive role in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and forms a complex with BCL6 via Hsp90. Cell Communication and Signaling. 2018; 16: 50.
  • [97] Han H, Fan G, Song S, Jiang Y, Qian C, Zhang W, et al. PiRNA-30473 contributes to tumorigenesis and poor prognosis by regulating m6a RNA methylation in DLBCL. Blood. 2021; 137: 1603–1614.
  • [98] Ma H, Shen L, Yang H, Gong H, Du X, Li J. m6A methyltransferase Wilms’ tumor 1-associated protein facilitates cell proliferation and cisplatin resistance in NK/T cell lymphoma by regulating dual-specificity phosphatases 6 expression via m6A RNA methylation. IUBMB Life. 2021; 73: 108–117.
  • [99] Wu G, Suo C, Yang Y, Shen S, Sun L, Li ST, et al. MYC promotes cancer progression by modulating m(6) A modifications to suppress target gene translation. EMBO Reports. 2021; 22: e51519.
  • [100] Watatani Y, Sato Y, Miyoshi H, Sakamoto K, Nishida K, Gion Y, et al. Molecular heterogeneity in peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified revealed by comprehensive genetic profiling. Leukemia. 2019; 33: 2867–2883.
  • [101] Hartmann EM, Beà S, Navarro A, Trapp V, Campo E, Ott G, et al. Increased tumor cell proliferation in mantle cell lymphoma is associated with elevated insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 3 expression. Modern Pathology. 2012; 25: 1227–1235.
  • [102] Esteve-Puig R, Climent F, Piñeyro D, Domingo-Domènech E, Davalos V, Encuentra M, et al. Epigenetic loss of m1a RNA demethylase ALKBH3 in Hodgkin lymphoma targets collagen, conferring poor clinical outcome. Blood. 2021; 137: 994–999.
  • [103] Schaefer M, Hagemann S, Hanna K, Lyko F. Azacytidine Inhibits RNA Methylation at DNMT2 Target Sites in Human Cancer Cell Lines. Cancer Research. 2009; 69: 8127–8132.
  • [104] Cheng JX, Chen L, Li Y, Cloe A, Yue M, Wei J, et al. RNA cytosine methylation and methyltransferases mediate chromatin organization and 5-azacytidine response and resistance in leukaemia. Nature Communications. 2018; 9: 1163.
Share and Cite
Meng-Ke Liu, Xiao-Jian Sun, Xiao-Dong Gao, Ying Qian, Li Wang, Wei-Li Zhao. Methylation alterations and advance of treatment in lymphoma. Frontiers in Bioscience-Landmark. 2021. 26(9); 602-613.