Navigation
Open Access
Review

Association between ovarian endometrioma and ovarian reserve

Michio Kitajima1,*,Khaleque Newaz Khan2,Ayumi Harada1,Ken Taniguchi1,Tsuneo Inoue1,Masanori Kaneuchi1,Kiyonori Miura1,Hideaki Masuzaki1
1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of BioMedical Sciences, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan
2
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajii-cho, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566. Japan
DOI: 10.2741/E810 Volume 10 Issue 1, pp.92-102
Published: 01 January 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Frontiers in endometriosis)
*Corresponding Author(s):  
Michio Kitajima
E-mail:  
m-kita@nagasaki-u.ac.jp
Abstract

Endometrioma is one of the main pathologies of endometriosis, though its pathogenesis still remains enigmatic. Ovarian reserve is defined as the number and quality of the follicles left in the ovary at any given time. The cause of infertility in women with endometriosis is multifactorial. Diminished ovarian reserve is major concern in women with endometriosis-associated infertility. Cystectomy for endometriomas could negatively impact on post-operative ovarian reserve. Some women had surgery for endometriomas suffer from poor ovarian response, which directly affects treatment results. In addition, endometriomas themselves may be a cause of diminished ovarian reserve. Destruction of normal histological structure in ovarian cortex may affect dormancy of primordial follicles. Therefore, determination of ovarian reserve may serve as an important role in the management of reproductive health of women with endometriosis. Although the knowledge on the physiology of follicular development and mechanism of maintenance of ovarian reserve are rapidly accumulating, results obtained by ovarian reserve testing after surgery should be carefully evaluated according to the time-points and selected test. Further investigation on this issue is warranted.

Key words

Ovarian Endometrioma, Ovarian Reserve, Surgery, Review

2. Introduction

Endometriosis affects 6-10% of women at reproductive age and may cause the disturbances on women’s quality of life due to pain and infertility (1). The pathogenesis of the disease had long been a matter of debate and it is still not fully elucidated (2). Endometriosis mainly occurs in pelvic organ, such as peritoneum, ovary and recto-vaginal septum, the pathogenesis and clinical entity is different from each specific anatomical lesion (3). Ovarian endometrioma may be originated from adhesion between peritoneum and ovarian surface implants and the pseudo cyst may be formed by incessant bleeding from endometriotic lesions (4). In another view, endometrioma may be originated from metaplasia of invaginated ovarian surface epithelium (5). It has been shown that primordial follicles in ovarian cortex that constitute ovarian reserve exist as nests in superficial layer of ovarian cortex (6). As ovarian endometrioma may be formed just beneath of ovarian surface according to either fore-mentioned hypothesis, such as pseudo cyst formation or metaplasia of epithelial inclusion cyst, dormant or early growing follicles in ovarian cortex may be affected by formation and progression of ovarian endometriomas. Similarly, surgical intervention to ovarian endometriomas may be detrimental to residual normal ovarian cortical tissue. Recently, large attentions had been paid on the risk of surgery on ovarian reserve in women with endometriomas. Many studies that evaluating the relationship between surgical intervention for endometriomas and post-operative ovarian reserve have been reported though the conclusion had not been reached. Confounding factors that affect the results of post-surgical ovarian reserve testing in women with endometriomas had not been well evaluated. On the other hand, ovarian endometrioma itself may be the cause of diminished ovarian reserve though clinical pictures of women with endometrioma without surgery had not been either elucidated. Therefore, in this review article, we tried to summarize the recent knowledge on the effect of endometriomas on ovarian reserve in pre- and post-surgery from its pathogenic point of view and surgery-related confounding variables that affect ovarian reserve testing to describe better clinical management on endometriosis.

3. The definition and the evaluation of ovarian reserve

The term ovarian reserve is currently defined as the number and quality of the follicles left in the ovary at any given time (7). Several clinical tests to estimate ovarian reserve had been proposed. Endocrinological, ultrasonographic, and histological methods had been implicated, however, the accuracy of ovarian reserve testing to measure quality and quantity of remaining primordial follicles is still unclear (8). Serum follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and estradiol (E2) levels in early follicular phase (i.e. cycle day 2-4) had long been utilized as markers for ovarian reserve classically, though the clinical value of this test is limited (9). Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), which is predominantly produced by the granulosa cells of the recruited preantral and early antral follicles from the nest of primordial follicle (AMH negative) until they become sensitive to gonadotrophin (10), now had got large popularity to predict ovarian reserve (11). Measurements of serum AMH may be superior to other markers of ovarian reserve, given its reliability and convenience, to estimate the number of growing follicles and ovarian reserve (12). Although some study suggested that serum AMH levels fluctuate little during the menstrual cycles, controversial results had been reported. Serum AMH levels may fluctuate especially with women with high basal AMH levels (the younger ovary pattern) comparing to those of women with low basal AMH levels (the ageing ovary pattern), and these fluctuations are randomly distributed during the cycles (13). Intra-individual variation of AMH throughout one cycle may be significantly and negatively associated with age (14). On the other hand, decrease in serum AMH levels can be observed after the exogenous gonadotropin treatment in infertile women, and it may be related to the exhaustion of AMH producing early follicles by continuous stimulation (15). Prolonged ovarian suppression caused by long-term administration of oral contraceptives or GnRH agonist may lower serum AMH levels (16, 17). As these medications are often prescribed in women with endometriosis, one should take these issues into considerations. Ultrasonographic markers, such as antral follicle count (AFC) also have been introduced to clinical practice as popular ovarian reserve marker. AFC represents visible small antrum in early follicular phase and correlate well with age related decline of ovarian reserve (18). On the other hand, it may be difficult to assess the exact number of antral follicles of the cystic ovary, such as endometrioma, before cystectomy (19). In addition, measurement error may be present among different ultrasonographers who perform examinations. Although it had been reported to be correlated with AMH value (20), measuring objects are different from those of serum AMH levels. Therefore, these two major ovarian reserve markers may have different roles in its ability to predict ovarian reserve.

4. The effects of endometrioma on ovarian reserve: pathogenic points of view

The pathogenesis of endometriomas had not been fully elucidated though several hypotheses had been proposed. Classically, retrograde menstruation into the pelvic cavity had been referred to as one of the major cause of endometriosis (21). Ovarian endometrioma may be the pseudo cyst that is formed by blood filled secretions from endometriotic lesion on ovarian surface adherent to broad ligament (pelvic peritoneum) (4). On the other hand, endometriomas may also be formed from metaplasia of epithelial lining of invaginated inclusion cyst (5). Recent observation suggested that endometriomas may also be formed from metaplastic change of corpus luteum cyst (22, 23). Interestingly, whatever the hypothesis, endometriomas may be developed in contiguity with surface ovarian cortex, which retain the pooling of primordial follicles that constitute ovarian reserve (Figure 1.). Concerning the development of endometriotic lesion may evoke marked inflammation in surrounding tissue, the function of ovarian cortex as reservoir of dormant follicles may be affected by developing endometriomas. It is quite possible that detrimental effects on ovarian reserve by endometriomas may be accentuated by the surgical damage.

Ovarian cortex derived from ovaries with endometriomas showed decreased follicular density compared to those of contralateral healthy ovaries (24) or non-endometriotic benign ovarian cyst (25). In addition, ovaries with endometriomas showed significant fibrosis formation in ovarian cortex that is related to decrease of follicular density (24). These results support that the inflammation and transformation of normal cortical structure caused by development of endometriomas may affect physiological functions of adjacent ovarian cortex as follicular reservoir. Accelerated follicular recruitment and at the same time, increased atresia of early follicles were found in the ovarian cortex derived from ovaries with endometriomas comparing to those of contralateral intact ovaries (26). These results may indicate “burn-out” of ovarian reserve along with the development of endometriomas could be responsible for decreased fecundity in women with endometriosis.

Figure 1. This photomicrograph is a representative finding of associations between the cyst wall of ovarian endometrioma and adjacent normal ovarian tissue. Hemorrhagic endometriotic lesion with dense fibrosis were constituted cyst wall, and numerous primordial follicles are present in normal ovarian cortex just beneath of the cyst wall. This histological sample was derived from woman had oophorectomy for ovarian endometrioma and full thickness sampling from inner surface of cyst wall to outer ovarian surface had been obtained. Original magnification *20, H.E. staining.

5. Ovarian reserve in women with endometriomas without surgery

The effect of endometriomas itself on the ovarian responsiveness that relate to ovarian reserve had been reported with several inconsistent results. In one study evaluated women with unilateral endometriomas, ovaries with disease showed lower response to ovarian stimulation than contralateral healthy ovaries (27). However, recent study on infertile women with un-operated unilateral small endometriomas did not support difference in ovarian responsiveness (28, 29). Some women with untreated endometriomas showed decreased pre-surgical AMH levels, especially those with bilateral lesion, compared to control women without endometriosis or with other benign ovarian cysts (30, 31).

One study reported that severity of endometriosis might be correlated with the decline of ovarian reserve measured by serum AMH levels comparing to control women without endometriosis (32). On the other hand, in another study, endometriosis and ovarian endometrioma per se do not result in lowering AMH levels (33). AMH levels were decreased in women with previous endometrioma surgery independently of the presence of current endometriomas (34). Hence, it may warrant additional accumulation of clinical information to draw definitive conclusions on the relationship between endometriomas per se (without surgery) and ovarian reserve.

6. Ovarian reserve in women had operated for endometriomas

6.1. Surgery for endometriomas may damage residual normal cortex

Surgery is the mainstay of the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Cystectomy is recommended for ovarian endometriomas larger than 3cm in terms of pain relief, recurrence rate and post-surgical fecundability (34). On the other hand, surgery may possess the risk of diminished ovarian reserve, which might affect post-surgical infertility treatment. Although some surgeons had reported excellent results (35, 36), cystectomy for endometrioma may cause unavoidable risk of surgical injury to residual normal ovarian tissue even with skilled hands (37). Interestingly, women with recurrent endometrioma after surgery showed better ovarian response during infertility treatment than women without recurrence (38). This report may suggest that surgical radicality may reduce recurrence rate though ovarian function may be sacrificed. Cystectomy for endometrioma may be more harmful than those for non-endometriotic benign ovarian cyst and the acute decline of AMH post-surgery in women with endometrioma may be related to the damage of the residual normal ovarian cortex (39).

6.2. Controversies in assessment of surgical damage with ovarian reserve testing in women with endometriomas

Several ovarian reserve testings had been utilized to evaluate the damage of surgery for endometriomas on residual normal ovarian cortex. The interpretation of the results may be dependent which test was utilized to assess the damage. When serum FSH had been considered as the evaluation factor, surgical damage to residual normal tissue may not correlate with serum FSH levels (40) Some report utilized serum inhibin B as the evaluation factor for post operative damage (41). Different ovarian reserve markers may bring different results after surgery. According to the clinical efficacy to predict ovarian response in ART settings comparing to other tests, fore-mentioned AMH and AFC can be regarded as most sensitive marker after the surgery for endometriomas though interpretation of the results should be made carefully (42). Post-operative AFC value had been evaluated by meta-analysis and systematic review, which revealed that surgery for endometrioma does not significantly affect ovarian reserve as evaluated by AFC (43). A lower AFC is present on the affected ovary both before and after surgery. Thus, surgical treatment for endometriomas may not affect the ovarian reserve than previously thought defined by AFC (43). In another report, serum AMH levels were significantly decreased after laparoscopic cystectomy while there were no significant changes in other ovarian reserve tests (FSH, E2, AFC and ovarian volumes) (37, 44). On the other hand, one study reported that AFC is reduced in ovaries with endometrioma though the number of oocytes retrieved in IVF-ET after surgery is similar, suggesting that the AFC is underestimated and may be the consequence of an impaired ability to detect small follicles in the presence of an endometrioma (45).

According to the systematic review and meta-analysis, the existing literature supports an adverse effect of ovarian endometriomas on markers of ovarian reserve (46,47). Surgical removal of endometriomas may worsen ovarian reserve by removing healthy ovarian cortex or compromising blood flow to the ovary. Meta-analysis and systematic review showed that surgical excision of endometriomas acutely impairs serum AMH levels (48, 49) (Table 1); whether this represents progressive or long term impairment remains the subject of ongoing investigation (50-52).

Table 1. Recent meta-analysis assessing the effects of ovarian endometriomas and its surgical treatment on ovarian reserve
YearAuthor (Ref#)The objective of meta-analysisNo of included studyNo of pooled subjectsOutcome measureResults
2015Ding W, et al. (62)Methods of hemostasis (suture or bipolar coagulation)21312AMH, FSH, AFC at 3-month follow-upbipolar coagulation vs. suture AMH↓ FSH↔ AFC↓
2015Ata B, et al (63)Methods of hemostasis (BD, suturing, HS application)6213AMH at 3month post surgeryBD vs. alternative methods AMH↓
2015Hamdan M, et al. (47)Endometrioma itself and its surgery on ART outcomes33928LBR, CPR, MNOR, CR, MR, FR, IR, AFCintact Eoma vs. no Eosis LBR, CPR↔ MNOR↓ CR↑ intact Eoma vs. Eosis without Eoma LBR, CPR, MNOR↔ AFC↓ treated Eoma vs. intact Eoma LBR, CPR, MNOR↔ FSH dose↑ treated Eoma vs. un-treated Eoma (contralateral) MNOR↓
2014Muzii L, et al. (43)Surgical treatment on ovarian reserve13597AFCun-treated Eoma vs. without Eoma (contralateral) AFC↓(but not statistically significant) treated Eoma vs. without Eoma (contralateral) AFC↓ before vs. after surgery AFC↔
2012Somigliana E, et al (48)Surgical treatment on ovarian reserve11NAAMH9 studies AMH↓ bilateral vs. unilateral AMH↓
2012Raffi F, et al. (49)Surgical treatment on ovarian reserve8237AMHcystectomy for Eoma AMH↓

6.3. The effects of surgical methods on post-surgical ovarian reserve

The choice of surgical methods for endometriomas (ablation or cystectomy) may influence the post surgical ovarian reserve. One prospective randomized study revealed that the ablation of cyst-wall may be more feasible than cystectomy in terms of preserving ovarian function (53). Another prospective randomized study utilizing the ablation with CO2 laser at second look laparoscopy after the irrigation and aspiration at primary laparoscopy and post-surgical GnRHa therapy for 3month (three-step procedure) did not show significant decline in post surgical serum AMH levels while one-step cystectomy showed significant decline in AMH levels (54). Another randomized controlled trial found that laparoscopic stripping of ovarian endometriotic cyst significantly decreases serum AMH levels and increases basal FSH levels independent of the method used to obtain hemostasis on the ovarian tissue (55). Recently, a study assessed AMH level after unilateral ovarian endometrioma cyst wall ablation using plasma energy showed immediate decrease followed by progressive increase of AMH level several months after the surgery, with good fertility outcomes (56). This surgical technique also showed significantly higher postoperative AFC and ovarian volume comparing to those of cystectomy (57). These studies implicate ablative surgery rather than cystectomy may be feasible in women need to preserve ovarian reserve for future fecundation.

For hemostatic technique during surgery, the suturing may be better hemostatic methods than bipolar coagulation in terms of protecting ovarian reserve (58). In another study, women with unilateral endometrioma had stripping without accessing a bipolar coagulation and performing an intra-cortical suture did not show statistically significant decreases in serum AMH levels after surgical excision of the cysts. These results suggest that an appropriate surgical technique, without the use of the bipolar coagulation of ovarian border, does not determine a significant reduction of ovarian reserve (59). However, other studies did not find any significant difference in the outcome of IVF or ovarian reserve marker between the two different methods of hemostasis (60, 61). Meta-analysis on the methods of hemostasis in the surgery with ovarian endometriomas had been reported, which concluded that usage of bipolar coagulation may deteriorate ovarian reserve (62, 63) (Table 1).

Recently, ultrasound-guided aspiration followed by ethanol sclerotherapy had been proposed as a conservative treatment before ART in women with recurrent endometriomas. Infertility treatment outcome may not be negatively affected while this procedure may bring about lower recurrence rate comparing to those of aspiration alone (64, 65). The effect of this procedure on ovarian reserve had not been well determined. The experiments in rodent had been suggested that concomitant decline in ovarian reserve due to increased fibrosis along with reduction in cyst diameters (66).

6.4. Confounding factors that affect post-surgical ovarian reserve

The factors that affect post-surgical decline in ovarian reserve had been evaluated in several reports. Age and laterality are significant contributors to the change of post- operative ovarian reserve marker (67). Kwon SK et al. had been reported that irrespective of the type of cyst (endometriomas or other benign cyst) laterality is only significant factor predicting the rate of decline in AMH levels after cystectomy (68). Severity of endometriosis (by r-ASRM score) may predict the decline of post-operative serum AMH levels (69). In another study, the operation-related damage to the ovarian reserve was positively related to whether the endometriomas were bilateral, as well as to the cyst size (especially for cysts >7 cm), but was negatively related to the pre-operative serum AMH level. Age was a negative factor that affected the ovarian reserve in this study (70).

The time points assessing ovarian reserve after surgery may show different clinical pictures. Most of the study revealed immediate reduction in serum AMH levels 1-3 months post-surgery. The decline of AMH may progressively persist at 6-month post cystectomy (71). Interestingly, Sugita et al. reported that decreased serum AMH levels immediately after cystectomy recovered at 12month post-surgery in about half of their study cohort. These results suggest that clinical factor(s) other than surgical damage may be attributed to persistent demise of ovarian reserve (51). One study reported that AFC decreased whereas ovarian volume and AMH levels did not negatively changed at 3 month after surgery (72). Another study also reported that serum AMH levels and AFC did not correlate each other at 6 month after surgery for endometriomas (73). These and pre-mentioned results may indicate that selection of test and time points should be taken into consideration when one to evaluate the damage of surgery for endometriomas.

7. Conclusions and future perspective

From the current information summarized in this review, ovarian endometriomas per se may damage ovarian reserve, and cystectomy of endometriomas may cause greater damage to ovarian reserve compared with other benign ovarian cysts. The damage on ovarian reserve in affected ovary before surgery may be related to destruction of normal ovarian cortical structure. Results of ovarian reserve test in women with endometriomas without surgery may be related to severity of the endometriosis at the surgery, laterality of the disease. This information may implicate the damage may progress along with development and growth of endometriomas though its mechanism had not been fully delineated and clinical information on this issue yet to be elucidated. Further study on the relationship between tissue inflammation caused by development of endometriomas and the maintenance of dormancy of primordial follciles that directly relate to ovarian reserve may be needed.

On the other hand, the damage on ovarian reserve by surgery for endometriomas is unpredictable in most of the cases and some women suffer from diminished ovarian reserve after surgery. Inconsistent results may be due to the limited ability of ovarian reserve testing to detect true surgical damage to residual normal ovary. The time points to perform ovarian reserve testing after surgery may be important to estimate the damage. Some specific factors relating to post-surgical ovarian reserve test, such as severity of the endometriosis at the surgery, laterality of the disease, size of the lesion, had been indicated. Ablative surgery rather than simple stripping technique may be feasible concerning ovarian reserve after surgery, however, additional data accumulation and consensus should be developed on the evaluation of the risk of different surgical methods on endometriomas.

Considering the pathogenesis of endometrioma and its putative effects on ovarian reserve, early diagnosis through a minimally invasive technique, followed by early ablative surgery whenever indicated, represents the management of choice to preserve ovarian reserve (4), though the efficacy of these strategy had not been well examined. Further research may be warranted to optimize the treatment strategy in women with endometrioma who need to preserve ovarian reserve and maintain consequent reproductive potentiality.

Abbreviations: FSH: follicle stimulating hormone; AMH: anti-Müllerian hormone; AFC: antral follicle count; TGF: transforming growth factor; MIS: Müllerian-inhibiting substance; ART: assisted reproductive technology; IVF-ET: in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer; GnRH: gonadotropin releasing hormone; ASRM: American society for reproductive medicine

References

    1. B Eskenazi, ML Warner: Epidemiology of endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 24, 235–258 (1997)
    DOI:10.1016/S0889-8545(05)70302-8

    2. RO Burney, LC Giudice: Pathogenesis and pathophysiology of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 98, 511-519 (2012)
    DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.029

    3. M Nisolle, J Donnez: Peritoneal endometriosis, ovarian endometriosis, and adenomyotic nodules of the rectovaginal septum are three different entities. Fertil Steril 68, 585-596 (1997)
    DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(97)00191-X

    4. I Brosens, S Gordts, P Puttemans, G Benagiano: Pathophysiology proposed as the basis for modern management of the ovarian endometrioma. Reprod Biomed Online 28, 232-238 (2014)
    DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.09.024

    5. J Donnez, M Nisolle, N Gillet, M Smets, S Bassil, F Casanas-Roux: Large ovarian endometriomas. Hum Reprod 11, 641-646 (1996)
    DOI:10.1093/HUMREP/11.3.641

    6. A Lass, R Silye, DC Abrams, T Krausz, O Hovatta, R Margara, RM Winston: Follicular density in ovarian biopsy of infertile women: a novel method to assess ovarian reserve. Hum Reprod 12, 1028-1031 (1997)
    DOI:10.1093/humrep/12.5.1028

    7. FJ Broekmans, J Kwee, DJ Hendriks, BW Mol, CB Lambalk: A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update 12, 685-718 (2006)
    DOI:10.1093/humupd/dml034

    8. A Bukman, MJ Heineman: Ovarian reserve testing and the use of prognostic models in patients with subfertility. Hum Reprod Update 7, 581-590 (2001)
    DOI:10.1093/humupd/7.6.581

    9. LF Bancsi, FJ Broekmans, BW Mol, JD Habbena, ER te Velde: Performance of basal follicle-stimulating hormone in the prediction of poor ovarian response and failure to become pregnant after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 79, 1091–1100 (2003)
    DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00078-5

    10. JA Visser, AP Themmen: Anti-Mullerian hormone and folliculogenesis. Mol Cell Endocrinol 234, 81–86 (2005)
    DOI:10.1016/j.mce.2004.09.008

    11. C Weenen, JS Laven, AR Von Bergh, M Cranfield, NP Groome, JA Visser, P Kramer, BC Fauser, AP Themmen: Anti-Müllerian hormone expression pattern in the human ovary: potential implications for initial and cyclic follicle recruitment. Mol Hum Reprod 10, 77-83 (2004)
    DOI:10.1093/molehr/gah015

    12. DB Seifer, DT MacLaughlin: Mullerian inhibiting substance is an ovarian growth factor of emerging clinical significance. Fertil Steril 88, 539–546 (2007)
    DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.02.014

    13. M Sowers, D McConnell, K Gast, H Zheng, B Nan, JD McCarthy, JF Randolph: Anti-Müllerian hormone and inhibin B variability during normal menstrual cycles. Fertil Steril 94, 1482-1486 (2010)
    DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.07.1674

    14. A Overbeek, FJ Broekmans, WJ Hehenkamp, ME Wijdeveld, J van Disseldorp, E van Dulmen-den Broeder, CB Lambalk: Intra-cycle fluctuations of anti-Müllerian hormone in normal women with a regular cycle: a re-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 24, 664-669 (2012)
    DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.02.023

    15. R Fanchin, LM Schonäuer, C Righini, N Frydman, R Frydman, J Taieb: Serum anti-Müllerian hormone dynamics during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Hum Reprod 18, 328-332 (2003)
    DOI:10.1093/humrep/deg043

    16. S Kallio, J Puurunen, A Ruokonen, T Vaskivuo, T Piltonen, JS Tapanainen: Antimüllerian hormone levels decrease in women using combined contraception independently of administration route. Fertil Steril 99, 1305-1310 (2013)
    DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.034

    17. CP Hagen, K Sørensen, RA Anderson, A Juul: Serum levels of antimüllerian hormone in early maturing girls before, during, and after suppression with GnRH agonist. Fertil Steril 98, 1326-1330 (2012)
    DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1118

    18. GJ Scheffer, FJ Broekmans, M Dorland, JD Habbema, CW Looman, ER te Velde: Antral follicle counts by transvaginal ultrasonography are related to age in women with proven natural fertility. Fertil Steril 72, 845-851 (1999)
    DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00396-9

    19. A Maheswari, P Fowler, S Bhattacharya: Assessment of ovarian reserve—should we perform tests of ovarian reserve routinely? Hum Reprod 21, 2729–2735 (2006)
    DOI:10.1093/humrep/del188

    20. KR Hansen, GM Hodnett, N Knowlton, LB Craig: Correlation of ovarian reserve tests with histologically determined primordial follicle number. Fertil Steril 95, 170-175 (2011)
    DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.006

    21. JA Sampson: Peritoneal endometriosis due to menstrual dissemination of endometrial tissue into the peritoneal cavity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 14, 442–469 (1927)
    DOI:10.1016/S0002-9378(15)30003-X

    22. C Nezhat, F Nezhat, C Nezhat, DS Seidman: Classification of endometriosis. Improving the classification of endometriotic ovarian cysts. Hum Reprod 9:2212-2213 (1994).
    DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138423

    23. P Vercellini, E Somigliana, P Vigano, A Abbiati, G Barbara, L Fedele: 'Blood On The Tracks' from corpora lutea to endometriomas. BJOG 116, 366-371 (2009)
    DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02055.x

    24. M Kitajima, S Defrère, MM Dolmans, S Colette, J Squifflet, A Van Langendonckt, J Donnez: Endometriomas as a possible cause of reduced ovarian reserve in women with endometriosis. Fertil Steril 96, 685-691 (2011)
    DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.06.064

    25. M Kuroda, K Kuroda, A Arakawa, Y Fukumura, M Kitade, I Kikuchi, J Kumakiri, S Matsuoka, IA Brosens, JJ Brosens, S Takeda, T Yao: Histological assessment of impact of ovarian endometrioma and laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 38, 1187-1193 (2012)
    DOI:10.1111/j.1447-0756.2012.01845.x

    26. M Kitajima, MM Dolmans, O Donnez, H Masuzaki, M Soares, J Donnez. Enhanced follicular recruitment and atresia in cortex derived from ovaries with endometriomas. Fertil Steril 101, 1031-1037 (2014)
    DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.049

    27. E Somigliana, M Infantino, F Benedetti, M Arnoldi, G Calanna, G Ragni: The presence of ovarian endometriomas is associated with a reduced responsiveness to gonadotropins. Fertil Steril 86, 192–196 (2006)
    DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.12.034

    28. I Esinler, G Bozdag, I Arikan, B Demir, H Yarali: Endometrioma≤3 cm in diameter per se does not affect ovarian reserve in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Gynecol Obstet Invest 74, 261–264 (2012)
    DOI:10.1159/000339630

    29. L Benaglia, R Pasin, E Somigliana, P Vercellini, G Ragni, L Fedele: Unoperated ovarian endometriomas and responsiveness to hyperstimulation. Hum Reprod 26, 1356-1361 (2011)
    DOI:10.1093/humrep/der097

    30. YM Hwu, FS Wu, SH Li, FJ Sun, MH Lin, RK Lee: The impact of endometrioma and laparoscopic cystectomy on serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 9, 80 (2011)
    DOI:10.1186/1477-7827-9-80

    31. E Somigliana, MA Marchese, MP Frattaruolo, N Berlanda, L Fedele, P Vercellini: Serum anti-mullerian hormone in reproductive aged women with benign ovarian cysts. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 180:142-147 (2014)
    DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.06.009

    32. A Pacchiarotti, P Frati, GN Milazzo, A Catalano, V Gentile, M Moscarini: Evaluation of serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels to assess the ovarian reserve in women with severe endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 172, 62-64 (2014)
    DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.10.003

    33. I Streuli, D de Ziegler, V Gayet, P Santulli, G Bijaoui, J de Mouzon, C Chapron: In women with endometriosis anti-Müllerian hormone levels are decreased only in those with previous endometrioma surgery. Hum Reprod 27, 3294-3303 (2012)
    DOI:10.1093/humrep/des274

    34. GA Dunselman, N Vermeulen, C Becker, C Calhaz-Jorge, T D'Hooghe, B De Bie, O Heikinheimo, AW Horne, L Kiesel, A Nap, A Prentice, E Saridogan, D Soriano, W Nelen; European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. ESHRE guideline: management of women with endometriosis: Hum Reprod 29, 400-412 (2014)
    DOI:10.1093/humrep/det457

    35. M Canis, JL Pouly, S Tamburro, G Mage, A Wattiez, MA Bruhat: Ovarian response during IVF-embryo transfer cycles after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy for endometriotic cysts of >3 cm in diameter. Hum Reprod 16, 2583-2586 (2001)
    DOI:10.1093/humrep/16.12.2583

    36. J Donnez, JC Lousse, P Jadoul, O Donnez, J Squifflet: Laparoscopic management of endometriomas using a combined technique of excisional (cystectomy) and ablative surgery. Fertil Steril 94, 28-32 (2010)
    DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.065

    37. CP Biacchiardi, LD Piane, M Camanni, F Deltetto, EM Delpiano, GL Marchino, G Gennarelli, A Revelli: Laparoscopic stripping of endometriomas negatively affects ovarian follicular reserve even if performed by experienced surgeons. Reprod Biomed Online 23, 740-746 (2011)
    DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.07.014

    38. E Somigliana, L Benaglia, P Vercellini, A Paffoni, G Ragni, L Fedele: Recurrent endometrioma and ovarian reserve: biological connection or surgical paradox? Am J Obstet Gynecol 204, 529.e1-5 (2011)
    DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2011.01.053

    39. M Kitajima, KN Khan, K Hiraki, T Inoue, A Fujishita, H Masuzaki: Changes in serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels may predict damage to residual normal ovarian tissue after laparoscopic surgery for women with ovarian endometrioma. Fertil Steril 95, 2589-2591.e1 (2011)
    DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.036

    40. J Shi, J Leng, Q Cui, J Lang: Follicle loss after laparoscopic treatment of ovarian endometriotic cysts. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 115, 277-281 (2011)
    DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.07.026

    41. M Coric, T Goluza, J Juras: Inhibin B for assessment of ovarian reserve after laparoscopic treatment of ovarian endometriomas. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 116, 169-170 (2012)
    DOI:10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.09.014

    42. L Muzii, AA Luciano, E Zupi, PB Panici: Effect of surgery for endometrioma on ovarian function: a different point of view. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21, 531 (2014)
    DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.022

    43. L Muzii, C Di Tucci, M Di Feliciantonio, C Marchetti, G Perniola, PB Panici: The effect of surgery for endometrioma on ovarian reserve evaluated by antral follicle count: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 29, 2190-2198 (2014)
    DOI:10.1093/humrep/deu199

    44. WK Jang, SY Lim, JC Park, KR Lee, A Lee, JH Rhee: Surgical impact on serum anti-Müllerian hormone in women with benign ovarian cyst: A prospective study. Obstet Gynecol Sci 57, 121-127 (2014)
    DOI:10.5468/ogs.2014.57.2.121

    45. ML Lima, Martins WP, Coelho Neto MA, Nastri CO, Ferriani RA, Navarro PA. Assessment of ovarian reserve by antral follicle count in ovaries with endometrioma. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 46, 239-42 (2015)
    DOI:10.1002/uog.14763

    46. G Legendre, L Catala, C Morinière, C Lacoeuille, F Boussion, L Sentilhes, P Descamps: Relationship between ovarian cysts and infertility: what surgery and when? Fertil Steril 101, 608-614 (2014)
    DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.021

    47. M Hamdan, G Dunselman, TC Li, Y Cheong: The impact of endometrioma on IVF/ICSI outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 21, 809-825 (2015)
    DOI:10.1093/humupd/dmv035

    48. E Somigliana, N Berlanda, L Benaglia, P Viganò, P Vercellini, L Fedele: Surgical excision of endometriomas and ovarian reserve: a systematic review on serum antimüllerian hormone level modifications. Fertil Steril 98:1531-1538 (2012)
    DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.009

    49. F Raffi, M Metwally, S Amer: The impact of excision of ovarian endometrioma on ovarian reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97, 3146-3154 (2012)
    DOI:10.1210/jc.2012-1558

    50. DK Shah, RB Mejia, DI Lebovic: Effect of surgery for endometrioma on ovarian function. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21, 203-209 (2014)
    DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2013.09.012

    51. A Sugita, A Iwase, M Goto, T Nakahara, T Nakamura, M Kondo, S Osuka, M Mori, A Saito, F Kikkawa: One-year follow-up of serum antimüllerian hormone levels in patients with cystectomy: are different sequential changes due to different mechanisms causing damage to the ovarian reserve? Fertil Steril 100, 516-522.e3 (2013)
    DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.03.032

    52. M Vignali, M Mabrouk, E Ciocca, G Alabiso, A Barbasetti di Prun, D Gentilini, M Busacca: Surgical excision of ovarian endometriomas: Does it truly impair ovarian reserve? Long term anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) changes after surgery. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 41, 1773-1778 (2015)
    DOI:10.1111/jog.12830

    53. T Var, S Batioglu, E Tonguc, I Kahyaoglu: The effect of laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy versus coagulation in bilateral endometriomas on ovarian reserve as determined by antral follicle count and ovarian volume: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril 95, 2247-2250 (2011)
    DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.03.078

    54. D Tsolakidis, G Pados, D Vavilis, D Athanatos, T Tsalikis, A Giannakou, BC Tarlatzis: The impact on ovarian reserve after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy versus three-stage management in patients with endometriomas: a prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril 94:71-77 (2010)
    DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.138

    55. S Ferrero, PL Venturini, DJ Gillott, V Remorgida, U Leone Roberti Maggiore: Hemostasis by bipolar coagulation versus suture after surgical stripping of bilateral ovarian endometriomas: a randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 19, 722-730 (2012)
    DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2012.08.001

    56. H Roman, M Bubenheim, M Auber, L Marpeau, L Puscasiu. Antimullerian hormone level and endometrioma ablation using plasma energy. JSLS 18, pii: e2014.0.0002 (2014)
    No DOI found

    57. H Roman, M Auber, C Mokdad, C Martin, A Diguet, L Marpeau, N Bourdel: Ovarian endometrioma ablation using plasma energy versus cystectomy: a step toward better preservation of the ovarian parenchyma in women wishing to conceive. Fertil Steril 96, 1396-1400 (2011)
    DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.045

    58. T Song, WY Kim, KW Lee, KH Kim: Effect on ovarian reserve of hemostasis by bipolar coagulation versus suture during laparoendoscopic single-site cystectomy for ovarian endometriomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22, 415-420 (2015)
    DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2014.11.002

    59. P Litta, G D'Agostino, L Conte, C Saccardi, V Cela, S Angioni, M Plebani : Anti-Müllerian hormone trend after laparoscopic surgery in women with ovarian endometrioma. Gynecol Endocrinol 29, 452-454 (2013)
    DOI:10.3109/09513590.2012.758704

    60. A Takashima , N Takeshita, K Otaka, T Kinoshita: Effects of bipolar electrocoagulation versus suture after laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometrioma on the ovarian reserve and outcome of in vitro fertilization. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 39, 1246-1252 (2013)
    DOI:10.1111/jog.12056

    61. C Tanprasertkul, S Ekarattanawong, O Sreshthaputra, T Vutyavanich: Impact of hemostasis methods, electrocoagulation versus suture, in laparoscopic endometriotic cystectomy on the ovarian reserve: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Assoc Thai 97 Suppl 8, S95-101 (2014)
    No DOI found

    62. W Ding, M Li, Y Teng: The impact on ovarian reserve of haemostasis by bipolar coagulation versus suture following surgical stripping of ovarian endometrioma: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 30, 635-642 (2015)
    DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.02.012

    63. B Ata, E Turkgeldi, A Seyhan, B Urman: Effect of hemostatic method on ovarian reserve following laparoscopic endometrioma excision; comparison of suture, hemostatic sealant, and bipolar dessication. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22, 363-372 (2015)
    DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2014.12.168

    64. MY Chang, CL Hsieh, CS Shiau, TT Hsieh, RD Chiang, CH Chan: Ultrasound-guided aspiration and ethanol sclerotherapy (EST) for treatment of cyst recurrence in patients after previous endometriosis surgery: analysis of influencing factors using a decision tree. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 20, 595-603 (2013)
    DOI:10.1016/j.jmig.2013.03.004

    65. KH Lee, CH Kim, YJ Lee, SH Kim, HD Chae, BM Kang: Surgical resection or aspiration with ethanol sclerotherapy of endometrioma before in vitro fertilization in infertilie women with endometrioma. Obstet Gynecol Sci 57, 297-303 (2014)
    DOI:10.5468/ogs.2014.57.4.297

    66. R Atilgan, ZS Ozkan, T Kuloglu, N Kocaman, M Baspinar, B Can, M Şimşek, E Sapmaz: Impact of intracystic ethanol instillation on ovarian cyst diameter and adjacent ovarian tissue. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 174, 133-136 (2014)
    DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.12.019

    67. S Alborzi, P Keramati, M Younesi, A Samsami, N Dadras: The impact of laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve in patients with unilateral and bilateral endometriomas. Fertil Steril 101, 427-434 (2014)
    DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.019

    68. SK Kwon, SH Kim, SC Yun, DY Kim, HD Chae, CH Kim, BM Kang: Decline of serum antimüllerian hormone levels after laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy in endometrioma and other benign cysts: a prospective cohort study. Fertil Steril 101, 435-441 (2014)
    DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.10.043

    69. W Hirokawa, A Iwase, M Goto, S Takikawa, Y Nagatomo, T Nakahara, B Bayasula, T Nakamura, S Manabe, F Kikkawa: The post-operative decline in serum anti-Mullerian hormone correlates with the bilaterality and severity of endometriosis. Hum Reprod 26, 904-910 (2011)
    DOI:10.1093/humrep/der006

    70. Y Chen, H Pei, Y Chang, M Chen, H Wang, H Xie, S Yao: The impact of endometrioma and laparoscopic cystectomy on ovarian reserve and the exploration of related factors assessed by serum anti-Mullerian hormone: a prospective cohort study. J Ovarian Res 26, 7, 108 (2014)
    No DOI found

    71. Celik HG, Dogan E, Okyay E, Ulukus C, Saatli B, Uysal S, Koyuncuoglu M. Effect of laparoscopic excision of endometriomas on ovarian reserve: serial changes in the serum antimüllerian hormone levels. Fertil Steril 97, 1472-1478 (2012)
    DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.03.027

    72. CM Ercan, NK Duru, KE Karasahin, H Coksuer, M Dede, I Baser: Ultrasonographic evaluation and anti-mullerian hormone levels after laparoscopic stripping of unilateral endometriomas. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 158, 280-284 (2011)
    DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.04.043

    73. G Uncu, I Kasapoglu, K Ozerkan, A Seyhan, A Oral Yilmaztepe, B Ata: Prospective assessment of the impact of endometriomas and their removal on ovarian reserve and determinants of the rate of decline in ovarian reserve. Hum Reprod 28, 2140-2145 (2013)
    DOI:10.1093/humrep/det123

Share and Cite
Michio Kitajima, Khaleque Newaz Khan, Ayumi Harada, Ken Taniguchi, Tsuneo Inoue, Masanori Kaneuchi, Kiyonori Miura, Hideaki Masuzaki. Association between ovarian endometrioma and ovarian reserve. Frontiers in Bioscience-Elite. 2018. 10(1); 92-102.